A randomized controlled trial testing the effects of a positive front-of-pack label with or without a physical activity equivalent label on food purchases
Autor: | Felicia Jia Ler Ang, Brett Doble, Wei Han Melvin Wong, Rob M. van Dam, Eric A. Finkelstein |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Adult
0301 basic medicine Grocery store Calorie Physical activity 030209 endocrinology & metabolism Nutrition facts label Choice Behavior law.invention Food Preferences 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial Food Labeling law Environmental health Humans Medicine Front of pack Exercise General Psychology Singapore 030109 nutrition & dietetics Nutrition and Dietetics business.industry Consumer Behavior Crossover study Calorie intake business Nutritive Value |
Zdroj: | Appetite. 158:104997 |
ISSN: | 0195-6663 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104997 |
Popis: | Background Positive front-of-pack (FOP) labels, including Singapore’s Healthier Choice Symbol (HCS), target a subset of healthier products whose consumption is to be encouraged. However, this may inadvertently lead to excess caloric intake, which could be addressed by including an additional label identifying calories per serving. We test this hypothesis by adding a Physical Activity Equivalent (PAE) label, an indicator of calorie content, to all products available in an on-line grocery store. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial using a 3 arm within-subject crossover design in adult Singapore residents recruited online. Participants shopped once in each condition in an experimental online grocery store in random order: 1) no FOP label (Control); 2) Select products displaying HCS labels (HCS-only); 3) Condition 2 with additional information displaying PAEs per serving on every product (HCS+PAE). 117 participants were recruited and data from 317 shops were analyzed. We used first-differenced regressions to assess the impact of the conditions on calories per serving (primary) and on other measures of diet quality. Results The HCS-only condition led to a statistically significant five-percentage point increase in the proportion of HCS products purchased (95% CI, 1%: 9%). However, neither the HCS-only (3.45; 95% CI, −12.52: 19.43) nor HCS + PAE (8.14; 95% CI, −5.25: 21.54) condition led to a change in the number of calories per serving purchased or changes in other measures of diet quality. Conclusions Positive labels, like the HCS, are likely to increase purchases of labelled products. However, these changes may not lead to improvements in diet quality or calorie intake. Combining positive labels with additional PAE information does not appear to address this concern. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |