'Active Labor' Duration and Dilation Rates Among Low‐Risk, Nulliparous Women With Spontaneous Labor Onset: A Systematic Review
Autor: | Karen Ahijevych, Thelma E. Patrick, Nancy K. Lowe, Jeremy L. Neal, Lori A. Cabbage, Elizabeth J. Corwin |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2010 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Time Factors Cervical dilation Cervix Uteri Article Uterine Contraction Pregnancy Risk Factors Active phase Maternity and Midwifery medicine Humans Gynecology Labor Obstetric business.industry Obstetrics Parturition Pregnancy Outcome Obstetrics and Gynecology Spontaneous labor Active Labor medicine.disease Parity Dilation (morphology) Female Cervical dilatation Labor Stage First business Labor duration |
Zdroj: | Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 55:308-318 |
ISSN: | 1542-2011 1526-9523 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.08.004 |
Popis: | Introduction Laboring women are often admitted to labor units under criteria that are commonly associated with the onset of active-phase labor (i.e., cervical dilatation of 3–5 cm in the presence of regular contractions). Beginning with these criteria through complete dilatation, this systematic review describes labor duration and cervical dilation rates among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset. Methods Studies published in English (between 1990 and 2008) were identified via MEDLINE and CINAHL searches. Data were abstracted and weighted “active labor” durations (i.e., from 3–5 cm through complete dilatation) and linear dilation rates were calculated. Results Eighteen studies (n = 7009) reported mean “active labor” duration. The weighted mean duration was 6.0 hours, and the calculated dilation rate was 1.2 cm per hour. These findings closely parallel those found at the median. At the statistical limits, the weighted “active labor” duration was 13.4 hours (mean + 2 standard deviations) and the dilation rate was 0.6 cm per hour (mean – 2 standard deviations). Discussion These findings indicate that nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset have longer “active” labors and therefore slower dilation rates than are traditionally associated with active labor when commonly used criteria are applied as the starting point. Revision of existing active labor expectations and/or criteria used to prospectively identify active phase onset is warranted. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |