Safe-by-Design in Engineering: An Overview and Comparative Analysis of Engineering Disciplines
| Autor: | Ruud Balkenende, Ruud van Ommen, Behnam Taebi, Bart Walhout, Ibo van de Poel, Pieter van Gelder, Tiny van der Werff, Dick Jung, Frank Hollmann, Wolter Pieters, Robbert Krebbers, Eelco Visser, Jos de Lange, Karel Terwel, Zoë Robaey, Erik-Jan van Kampen, Nima Khakzad, Lotte Asveld, Pim Klaassen |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Athena Institute, Network Institute |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Engineering
Technology Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis Risk-based design Social Sciences responsible research and innovation 02 engineering and technology 010501 environmental sciences 01 natural sciences Article Filosofie Responsible research and innovation Humanities Safe-by-design Design for values uncertainty Secure-by-design Risk management 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Work Health and Performance safe-by-design secure-by-design risk-based design design for values Responsible Research and Innovation business.industry Corporate governance Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Equity (finance) Uncertainty 021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology Secure by design SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities Philosophy Attitude Sustainability Medicine Engineering ethics 0210 nano-technology business Discipline Municipal or urban engineering |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (2021) 12 van Gelder, P, Klaassen, P, Taebi, B, Walhout, B, van Ommen, R, van de Poel, I, Robaey, Z, Asveld, L, Balkenende, R, Hollmann, F, van Kampen, E J, Khakzad, N, Krebbers, R, de Lange, J, Pieters, W, Terwel, K, Visser, E, van der Werff, T & Jung, D 2021, ' Safe-by-design in engineering : An overview and comparative analysis of engineering disciplines ', International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 12, 6329 . https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126329 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health; Volume 18; Issue 12; Pages: 6329 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 12 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12):6329. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 6329, p 6329 (2021) International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12) |
| ISSN: | 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
| Popis: | Contains fulltext : 237091.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) In this paper, we provide an overview of how Safe-by-Design is conceived and applied in practice in a large number of engineering disciplines. We discuss the differences, commonalities, and possibilities for mutual learning found in those practices and identify several ways of putting those disciplinary outlooks in perspective. The considered engineering disciplines in the order of historically grown technologies are construction engineering, chemical engineering, aerospace engineering, urban engineering, software engineering, bio-engineering, nano-engineering, and finally cyber space engineering. Each discipline is briefly introduced, the technology at issue is described, the relevant or dominant hazards are examined, the social challenge(s) are observed, and the relevant developments in the field are described. Within each discipline the risk management strategies, the design principles promoting safety or safety awareness, and associated methods or tools are discussed. Possible dilemmas that the designers in the discipline face are highlighted. Each discipline is concluded by discussing the opportunities and bottlenecks in addressing safety. Commonalities and differences between the engineering disciplines are investigated, specifically on the design strategies for which empirical data have been collected. We argue that Safe-by-Design is best considered as a specific elaboration of Responsible Research and Innovation, with an explicit focus on safety in relation to other important values in engineering such as well-being, sustainability, equity, and affordability. Safe-by-Design provides for an intellectual venue where social science and the humanities (SSH) collaborate on technological developments and innovation by helping to proactively incorporate safety considerations into engineering practices, while navigating between the extremes of technological optimism and disproportionate precaution. As such, Safe-by-Design is also a practical tool for policymakers and risk assessors that helps shape governance arrangements for accommodating and incentivizing safety, while fully acknowledging uncertainty. 28 p. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|