Validity of International Health Regulations in Reporting Emerging Infectious Diseases
Autor: | Julius Weinberg, David L Heymann, Johan Giesecke, Michael Edelstein |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2012 |
Předmět: |
Microbiology (medical)
medicine.medical_specialty international health regulations diagnosis Epidemiology media_common.quotation_subject education lcsh:Medicine specificity communicable diseases World Health Organization Communicable Diseases Emerging Sensitivity and Specificity International Health Regulations World health lcsh:Infectious and parasitic diseases emerging infectious diseases Predictive Value of Tests Environmental health medicine Humans lcsh:RC109-216 Disease Notification Health policy media_common reporting business.industry Health Policy Research Public health lcsh:R International health sensitivity decision instrument Infectious Diseases Population Surveillance Communicable Disease Control Emerging infectious disease notification Public Health reproducibility of results business Seriousness |
Zdroj: | Emerging Infectious Diseases Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol 18, Iss 7, Pp 1115-1120 (2012) |
ISSN: | 1080-6059 1080-6040 |
DOI: | 10.3201/eid1807.111608 |
Popis: | Use of more prescriptive criteria and training of persons responsible for reporting could improve results. Understanding which emerging infectious diseases are of international public health concern is vital. The International Health Regulations include a decision instrument to help countries determine which public health events are of international concern and require reporting to the World Health Organization (WHO) on the basis of seriousness, unusualness, international spread and trade, or need for travel restrictions. This study examined the validity of the International Health Regulations decision instrument in reporting emerging infectious disease to WHO by calculating its sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. It found a sensitivity of 95.6%, a specificity of 38%, and a positive predictive value of 35.5%. These findings are acceptable if the notification volume to WHO remains low. Validity could be improved by setting more prescriptive criteria of seriousness and unusualness and training persons responsible for notification. However, the criteria should be balanced with the need for the instrument to adapt to future unknown threats. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |