The resilience paradox
| Autor: | George A. Bonanno |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
050103 clinical psychology
RC435-571 Outcome (game theory) Stress Disorders Post-Traumatic 0302 clinical medicine 情感 Surveys and Questionnaires small effects Adaptation Psychological Longitudinal Studies Situational ethics media_common Psychiatry 05 social sciences Traumatic stress Resilience Psychological 心理韧性 predicción coping flexibility trauma personalidad Resiliencia Psychological resilience Psychology 创伤 Algorithms Cognitive psychology Research Article 应对 机器学习 self-regulation Process (engineering) media_common.quotation_subject efectos pequeños emotion 预测 Context (language use) 个性 flexibilidad 灵活性 Self-Control 03 medical and health sciences autorregulación aprendizaje automático Humans 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Resilience Inaugural Lecture prediction emoción 自我调节 030227 psychiatry afrontamiento personality Wounds and Injuries maching learning 小效应 |
| Zdroj: | European Journal of Psychotraumatology article-version (VoR) Version of Record European Journal of Psychotraumatology, Vol 12, Iss 1 (2021) |
| ISSN: | 2000-8066 2000-8198 |
| Popis: | Decades of research have consistently shown that the most common outcome following potential trauma is a stable trajectory of healthy functioning, or resilience. However, attempts to predict resilience reveal a paradox: the correlates of resilient outcomes are generally so modest that it is not possible accurately identify who will be resilient to potential trauma and who not. Commonly used resilience questionnaires essentially ignore this paradox by including only a few presumably key predictors. However, these questionnaires show virtually no predictive utility. The opposite approach, capturing as many predictors as possible using multivariate modelling or machine learning, also fails to fully address the paradox. A closer examination of small effects reveals two primary reasons for these predictive failures: situational variability and the cost-benefit tradeoffs inherent in all behavioural responses. Together, these considerations indicate that behavioural adjustment to traumatic stress is an ongoing process that necessitates flexible self-regulation. To that end, recent research and theory on flexible self-regulation in the context of resilience are discussed and next steps are considered. HIGHLIGHTS Although correlates of resilience after trauma are known, paradoxically, prediction of resilient outcomes is surprisingly weak. Predictors have generally small effects which suggests that the solution to the paradox must involve flexible self-regulation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
| Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |