Instruments Measuring Prospective Memory: A Systematic and Meta-Analytic Review
| Autor: | Geoffrey Blondelle, Mathieu Hainselin, Véronique Quaglino, Yannick Gounden |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Centre de Recherche en Psychologie : Cognition, Psychisme et Organisations - UR UPJV 7273 (CRP-CPO), Université de Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV) |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Psychometrics
Memory Episodic [SHS.EDU]Humanities and Social Sciences/Education Validity [SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology PsycINFO Neuropsychological Tests 050105 experimental psychology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Prospective memory Humans Medicine 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Neuropsychological assessment Memory Disorders medicine.diagnostic_test [SDV.NEU.PC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Psychology and behavior business.industry 05 social sciences Reproducibility of Results [SDV.NEU.SC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Cognitive Sciences General Medicine Test (assessment) Psychiatry and Mental health Clinical Psychology Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology Meta-analysis [SDV.MHEP.PSM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Psychiatrics and mental health Single trial business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2020, 35 (5), pp.576-596. ⟨10.1093/arclin/acaa009⟩ |
| ISSN: | 0887-6177 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/arclin/acaa009⟩ |
| Popis: | Objective To identify the available measures to assess prospective memory (PM) abilities, to describe their content, and to quantitatively summarize the effects of various diseases on PM depending on the type of assessment Method Three databases (PsycInfo, PsycArticles and PubMed) were searched up to June 2019 to identify the existing PM measures. The identified PM measures were classified according to the type of assessment: test batteries, single-trial procedures, questionnaires, and experimental procedures. The characteristics and psychometric properties were presented. PM performances were compared between patients with various diseases and controls depending on the type of assessment. Results Most of the 16 measures identified evaluated both event- and time-based tasks, were linked to functional outcomes, showed empirical evidences regarding validity and reliability, and provided parallel versions. To a slightly lesser extent, few measures provided normative data, translations/adaptation into another language, cutoff scores for diagnostic purposes, qualitative scoring, parallel version, and external aids during the test. Compared to healthy controls, patients had significantly poorer performances when PM was assessed with experimental procedures. Heterogeneous data precluded the interpretation of a summary effect for test batteries, single-trial procedures, and questionnaires. Planned subgroup analyses indicated consistent PM impairment for patients compared to controls for three test batteries. However, PM complaints did not differ between patients and controls. Conclusions These results suggest that the use of PM test batteries and experimental procedures are relevant for detecting performance variations in diverse clinical populations. Clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|