Failure to Meet Nurse Staffing Standards: A Litigation Case Study of a Large US Nursing Home Chain
Autor: | S J D Toby Edelman, RN Charlene Harrington PhD |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
nurse staffing
media_common.quotation_subject Personnel Staffing and Scheduling Staffing Special Collection: Nursing Home Performance 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Nursing quality of care Humans resident rights Quality (business) 030212 general & internal medicine Quality of care Quality of Health Care media_common Arkansas lcsh:Public aspects of medicine 030503 health policy & services Health Policy Nurse staffing Ownership litigation lcsh:RA1-1270 regulation Chain (unit) Nursing Homes Organizational Case Studies Nursing Staff nursing home chains Business 0305 other medical science Settlement (litigation) Nursing homes Class action |
Zdroj: | Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision and Financing Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, Vol 55 (2018) |
ISSN: | 1945-7243 0046-9580 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0046958018788686 |
Popis: | Large for-profit nursing home chains in the United States have generally reported low nurse staffing levels. This historical case study examined a class action litigation case regarding staffing levels, resident rights, and quality outcomes in 12 Arkansas nursing homes owned by a large for-profit chain. The questions were as follows: (1) How did the residents’ care needs compare with actual nurse staffing levels? (2) How did the staffing levels compare with federal and state nurse staffing requirements and professional staffing standards? (3) Did the facilities comply with state and federal residents’ rights and quality of care requirements? The findings showed staffing levels marginally above state minimum standards, staffing shortages that violated state standards, staffing levels not adjusted for resident acuity, and shortages that resulted in omitted care. Staffing levels were lower than needed according to nursing directors, lower than average facilities in the state, and lower than professional standards. The findings showed many resident grievances regarding basic care and residents’ rights, clinical measures of poor quality, and state deficiencies. A large settlement was agreed on to compensate the residents. The case shows that chain’s management, as well as the regulatory system, failed to ensure adequate staffing levels that took into account regulatory requirements and professional standards and resulted in violations of residents’ rights, health, safety, and well-being. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |