Inter-observer variation of Syntax score among cardiac surgeons, clinical and interventional cardiologists

Autor: Guilherme Pinheiro Machado, Ana Maria Rocha Krepsky, Carisi Anne Polanczyk, Luiz Carlos Corsetti Bergoli, Sandro Cadaval Gonçalves, Mariana Vargas Furtado, Bruno da Silva Matte, Gustavo Neves de Araújo, Marco Vugman Wainstein, Tiago Luiz Luz Leiria
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
medicine.medical_specialty
lcsh:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
Bypass grafting
left main
medicine.medical_treatment
Clinical Decision-Making
Coronary Artery Disease
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Coronary Angiography
multivessel disease
Decision Support Techniques
03 medical and health sciences
Cardiologists
0302 clinical medicine
coronary artery bypass graft
Predictive Value of Tests
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Pharmacology (medical)
030212 general & internal medicine
Coronary Artery Bypass
Original Research
Observer Variation
Surgeons
Syntax (programming languages)
business.industry
Patient Selection
percutaneous coronary intervention
Reproducibility of Results
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Multivessel disease
Coronary Vessels
SYNTAX score
Cross-Sectional Studies
lcsh:RC666-701
Conventional PCI
Cardiology
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Observer variation
Zdroj: Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, Vol 14 (2020)
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
ISSN: 1753-9455
Popis: Background: Despite the complexity of SYNTAX score (SS), guidelines recommend this tool to help choosing between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main of three-vessel coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to compare the inter-observer variation in SS performed by clinical cardiologists (CC), interventional cardiologists (IC), and cardiac surgeons (CS). Methods: Seven coronary angiographies from patients with left main and/or three-vessel disease chosen by a heart team were analyzed by 10 CC, 10 IC and 10 CS. SS was calculated via SYNTAX website. Results: Kappa concordance was very low between CC and CS (k = 0.176), moderate between CS and IC (k = 0.563), and moderate between CC and IC (0.553). There was a statistically significant difference between CC, who classified more cases as low complexity (70%), and CS, who classified more cases as moderate complexity (80%) ( p = 0.041). Conclusion: Concordance between SS analyzed by CC, CS and IC is low. The usefulness of SS in decision-making of revascularization strategy is undeniable and evidence supports its use. However, this study highlights the importance of well-trained professionals on calculating the SS. It could avoid misclassification of borderline cases.
Databáze: OpenAIRE