Robotic surgery vs laparoscopic surgery in patients with diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
| Autor: | Giulia Marini, Ursula Catena, Liliana Mereu, Rossana Moroni, Francesco Fanfani, Maria Roberta Spina, Vito Cela, Michela Milani, Luigi Carlo Turco, Giovanni Scambia, Angelo Finelli, Stefano Restaino |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Laparoscopic surgery
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment Operative Time 030232 urology & nephrology Endometriosis Blood Loss Surgical Health Informatics CINAHL 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Postoperative Complications Robotic Surgical Procedures Surgical medicine Humans In patient Robotic surgery Blood Loss business.industry Length of Stay medicine.disease Confidence interval Surgery Treatment Outcome Settore MED/40 - GINECOLOGIA E OSTETRICIA 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Meta-analysis Feasibility Studies Female Laparoscopy Safety Complication business |
| Popis: | Endometriosis is one of the most common medical conditions affecting the women. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RAS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery (LPS) in the treatment of endometriosis. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and CINAHL databases were searched from January 1995 to March 2019. According to meta-analysis criteria, five comparative studies were selected. A total of 1527 patients were identified. In the meta-analysis, there were no significant differences in blood loss, complication, and hospital stay between RAS and LPS surgeries in the treatment of patients with endometriosis. However, RAS surgery required a higher weighted mean operating time than LPS surgery, 0.54 (95% confidence interval; 0.37 to 0.70; p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|