Six dimensions of research trial acceptability: how much, what, when, in what circumstances, to whom and why?
| Autor: | Mackwellings Phiri, Nicola Desmond, Kate Gooding, Michael Parker, Ingrid Peterson |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Parents Malawi Health (social science) media_common.quotation_subject Decision Making Context (language use) Participant observation 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Article Developmental psychology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine History and Philosophy of Science qv_771 Humans 030212 general & internal medicine media_common Clinical Trials as Topic Vaccines Vaccine trial Infant 06 humanities and the arts Patient Acceptance of Health Care w_20.5 wb_60 Variation (linguistics) Feeling Child Preschool Female 060301 applied ethics In degree Psychology |
| Zdroj: | Soc Sci Med |
| ISSN: | 0277-9536 |
| Popis: | Ethics guidelines emphasise that research should be acceptable to the people invited to take part. However, acceptability is subjective and dependent on context, complicating its assessment and use as an ethical standard. This paper examines the concept of acceptability in relation to parents' perspectives on a paediatric vaccine trial in Malawi. We examined decisions on participation and experiences of the trial through interviews with parents in 41 households invited to enrol their children and participant observation of trial processes. Fieldwork took place in Chikwawa, Southern Malawi from February–October 2016. Parents were not neatly split between those who saw the trial as acceptable and those who did not; instead there were mixed and changing feelings among parents who enrolled their children, and among those who withdrew or did not take part. Some parents agreed to participate but had concerns about the trial, while others expressed satisfaction with the trial but still did not take part. These experiences indicate substantial variation in the nature of acceptance. We describe these variations in relation to six dimensions of acceptability: how acceptable the trial is, what aspects are acceptable, changes over time, circumstances affecting acceptability, variations between people, and reasons for participation or non-participation. The findings illustrate the difficulty of determining whether a trial is sufficiently acceptable to potential participants. We suggest that clarifying definitions of acceptability and examining how acceptability varies in degree, between trial components, over time, and between people and contexts may help researchers generate more nuanced descriptions of acceptability that support responsive and ethical trial design. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect