Extended Anterior Inferior Approach to Endoscopic Medial Maxillectomy for Maxillary Sinus Lesions
| Autor: | Alice E. Huang, Janalee K. Stokken, Christopher M. Low |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Rhinology
medicine.medical_specialty Maxillary sinus medicine.medical_treatment Dacryocystorhinostomy 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Empty nose syndrome Humans Immunology and Allergy 030223 otorhinolaryngology Sinus (anatomy) Retrospective Studies Nasolacrimal duct business.industry Cosmesis Endoscopy General Medicine Hypoesthesia Maxillary Sinus medicine.disease Surgery medicine.anatomical_structure Otorhinolaryngology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Neoplasm Recurrence Local medicine.symptom business Nasolacrimal Duct |
| Zdroj: | American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy. 35:895-901 |
| ISSN: | 1945-8932 1945-8924 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/19458924211025371 |
| Popis: | Background Myriad open and endoscopic approaches are employed to resect maxillary sinus lesions, each with associated advantages and disadvantages. The inferior and anterior portion of the sinus remains a challenging space to access. Objectives To describe the extended anterior inferior approach to endoscopic medial maxillectomy (EAMM) as a novel and valuable addition to a stepwise approach for minimizing surgical morbidity without compromising tumor outcomes. To report the outcomes of patients treated with this approach. Methods A retrospective case series study of 9 patients who underwent EAMM between 2016 and 2019 at a tertiary care referral center was performed. The endoscopic technique is described. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 53 months. Intraoperative steps, including transection of the nasolacrimal duct and execution of an intraoperative dacryocystorhinostomy, were reviewed. Postoperative outcomes, including patient symptoms at follow-up and tumor recurrence, were recorded. Results Adequate exposure with gross total tumor resection or margin-negative tumor resection was achieved in all cases. Sparing of the nasolacrimal duct was achieved in 2 patients. No patients reported persistent epiphora, empty nose syndrome, or changes in cosmesis such as alar or nasal tip collapse. One patient reported unilateral V2 hypoesthesia at 6 months postoperatively that had resolved by his next follow-up 18 months after surgery. Postoperative tumor surveillance was achieved by endoscopic examinations in all patients and there was no evidence of tumor recurrence at a median follow-up of 22 months. Conclusions The EAMM provides improved access to the inferior–posterior–medial maxillary sinus. This approach minimizes the risk of hypoesthesia and change in cosmesis present in other approaches, and obviates division of the nasolacrimal duct for inferior, posterior–medial attached lesions. This progressive escalation of approach for maxillary sinus lesions minimizes injury to nasal and nasolacrimal structures without compromising tumor outcomes. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|