Autor: |
Liu, Sicheng, Peng, Xingyu, Wu, Xun, Bu, Fanqin, Yu, Zhonglin, Zhu, Jinfeng, Luo, Chen, Zhang, Wenjun, Liu, Jiang, Huang, Jun |
Rok vydání: |
2022 |
DOI: |
10.6084/m9.figshare.19314670 |
Popis: |
Additional file 2: Figure S2. (A) and (C) train queue lasso region, (B) and (D) test queue lasso region, (E), train queue forest map shows 14 DEirlncrna pairs determined by Cox proportional risk regression in the stepwise method, and (F) test queue forest map shows 13 DEirlncrna pairs determined by Cox proportional risk regression in the stepwise method. Figure S3. (A) Train queue Risk Score for 213 patients with COAD. the maximum inflection point is the cut-off point obtained by the AIC. (B), Test queue Risk Score for 213 patients with colon cancer. the maximum inflection point is the cut-off point obtained by the AIC. (C) The comparison of the 3-year ROC curve of the train cohort with other common clinical features shows the superiority of risk score. (D) The comparison of the 3-year ROC curve of the test cohort with other common clinical features shows the superiority of risk score. (E) Analysis of time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in train queue. (F) Time dependent ROC curve analysis of test queue. Figure S4: The prognostic model was validated in the train and test cohorts. (A) Overall survival (OS) of the train queue. (B) Total lifetime of test queue. (C) Risk score distribution in the train queue. (D) Risk score distribution in test queue. (E) Scatter diagram of survival status of train queue. (F) Scatter diagram of survival state of test queue. |
Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
|