The Effect of Medication Reconciliation via a Patient Portal on Medication Discrepancies: A Randomized Noninferiority Study
| Autor: | Marieke M. Ebbens, Elsbeth J. Wesselink, Kim B. Gombert-Handoko, Patricia M. L. A. van den Bemt |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Real World Studies in PharmacoEpidemiology, -Genetics, -Economics and -Therapy (PEGET), Pharmacy |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Pharmacy technicians ERRORS law.invention 03 medical and health sciences pharmaceutical services Medication Reconciliation 0302 clinical medicine Patient satisfaction SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being Patient Portals Randomized controlled trial law Intervention (counseling) HISTORY medicine Clinical endpoint Humans Medication Errors media_common.cataloged_instance 030212 general & internal medicine Elective surgery General Nursing media_common business.industry Health Policy Patient portal RECORD General Medicine LISTS randomized controlled trial Emergency medicine Geriatrics and Gerontology business Pharmacy technician 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(12), 2553-+. ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(12), 2553-2558.e1. ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(12), 2553-2558.e1. Elsevier Inc. |
| ISSN: | 1525-8610 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.03.022 |
| Popis: | Background: Medication reconciliation has become standard care to prevent medication transfer errors. However, this process is time-consuming but could be more efficient when patients are engaged in medication reconciliation via a patient portal. Objectives: To explore whether medication reconciliation by the patient via a patient portal is noninferior to medication reconciliation by a pharmacy technician. Design (including intervention): Open randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Patients were randomized between medication reconciliation via a patient portal (intervention) or medication reconciliation by a pharmacy technician at the preoperative screening (usual care). Setting and Participants: Patients scheduled for elective surgery using at least 1 chronic medication were included. Measures: The primary endpoint was the number of medication discrepancies compared to the electronic nationwide medication record system (NMRS). For the secondary endpoint, time investment of the pharmacy technician for the medication reconciliation interview and patient satisfaction were studied. Noninferiority was analyzed with an independent t test, and the margin was set at 20%. Results: A total of 499 patients were included. The patient portal group contained 241 patients; the usual care group contained 258 patients. The number of medication discrepancies was 2.6 +/- 2.5 in the patient portal group and 2.8 +/- 2.7 in the usual care group. This was not statistically different and within the predefined noninferiority margin. Patients were satisfied with the use of the patient portal tool. Also, the use of the portal can save on average 6.8 minutes per patient compared with usual care. Conclusions and Implications: Medication reconciliation using a patient portal is noninferior to medication reconciliation by a pharmacy technician with respect to medication discrepancies, and saves time in the medication reconciliation process. Future studies should focus on identifying patient characteristics for successful implementation of patient portal medication reconciliation. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA -The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|