DISAGREEMENTS ABOUT TASTE VS. DISAGREEMENTS ABOUT MORAL ISSUES

Autor:	ISIDORA STOJANOVIC
Přispěvatelé:	Institut Jean-Nicod (IJN), Département d'Etudes Cognitives - ENS Paris (DEC), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)-Collège de France (CdF (institution))-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Département de Philosophie - ENS Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Stojanovic, Isidora
Rok vydání:	2019
Předmět:	[SHS.PHIL] Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy moral terms Philosophy predicates of personal taste [SHS.PHIL]Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy experience-sensitivity evaluative predicates ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS disagreement
Zdroj:	American Philosophical Quarterly American Philosophical Quarterly, University of Illinois Press, 2019, 56 (1), pp.29-41 HAL
ISSN:	2152-1123 0003-0481
Popis:	The aim of this paper is to argue against a growing tendency to assimilate moral disagreements to disagreements about matters of personal taste. The argumentative strategy adopted in the paper appeals to a battery of linguistic criteria that reveal interesting and important differences between predicates of personal taste and moral predicates. The paper further argues that these semantically tractable differences have an impact on the nature of the corresponding disagreements.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::3323e6d7f865eb5018af4297269a51c7 https://doi.org/10.2307/45128641 Zobrazit plný text záznamu