DISAGREEMENTS ABOUT TASTE VS. DISAGREEMENTS ABOUT MORAL ISSUES
Autor: | ISIDORA STOJANOVIC |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Institut Jean-Nicod (IJN), Département d'Etudes Cognitives - ENS Paris (DEC), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)-Collège de France (CdF (institution))-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Département de Philosophie - ENS Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Stojanovic, Isidora |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | American Philosophical Quarterly American Philosophical Quarterly, University of Illinois Press, 2019, 56 (1), pp.29-41 HAL |
ISSN: | 2152-1123 0003-0481 |
Popis: | The aim of this paper is to argue against a growing tendency to assimilate moral disagreements to disagreements about matters of personal taste. The argumentative strategy adopted in the paper appeals to a battery of linguistic criteria that reveal interesting and important differences between predicates of personal taste and moral predicates. The paper further argues that these semantically tractable differences have an impact on the nature of the corresponding disagreements. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |