Autor: |
Libing Zhu, Xu, Feng, Wenrong Wan, Yu, Bin, Tang, Lin, Yiming Yang, Yanling Du, Chen, Zhangran, Hongzhu Xu |
Rok vydání: |
2020 |
DOI: |
10.6084/m9.figshare.12904895 |
Popis: |
Additional file 2: Figure S1. The rarefaction curves of all sample. (A) Observed species and (B) chao1. Figure S2. The bacterial community difference between AR and non-AR group. (A) The ANOSIM analysis are made to compare the intergroup and within group of samples. (B) The bacterial community variation comparison in AR and non-AR group. Figure S3. The predicted expression of distinguished pathway. The significantly distinguished pathway predicted by PICRUSt were screened by comparison between AR and non-AR individuals by Wilcox test and based on |logFC|>1. FC denotes fold change. Figure S4. Comparisons of bacterial diversity between moderate and severe AR patients. (A) The bacterial α diversity indexes comparison between moderate and severe AR, including Chao1, J and Shannon. Letters indicate the ANOVA groupings. (B) Differences in bacterial community structures between moderate and severe AR patients. |
Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
|