Impact of Dry Eye on Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity: Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study

Autor: Gui-Shuang Ying, Meng C. Lin, Penny A. Asbell, Dry Eye Assessment, Maureen G. Maguire, Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn, Reza Dana, Vatinee Y Bunya
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Male
Refractive error
Visual acuity
genetic structures
Study research
Visual Acuity
Meibomian gland
Eye
Ophthalmology & Optometry
Medical and Health Sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Medicine
Contrast (vision)
Ocular Surface Disease Index
Schirmer test
media_common
Meibomian Glands
Middle Aged
Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) Study Research Group
Drug Combinations
medicine.anatomical_structure
Eicosapentaenoic Acid
Dry Eye Syndromes
Female
medicine.symptom
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Docosahexaenoic Acids
media_common.quotation_subject
Article
Contrast Sensitivity
03 medical and health sciences
Double-Blind Method
Clinical Research
Ophthalmology
Humans
Eye Disease and Disorders of Vision
Aged
business.industry
medicine.disease
eye diseases
Cross-Sectional Studies
Tears
030221 ophthalmology & optometry
sense organs
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Optometry
Linear trend
Zdroj: Optom Vis Sci
Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, vol 96, iss 6
ISSN: 1538-9235
1040-5488
DOI: 10.1097/opx.0000000000001387
Popis: Author(s): Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B; Maguire, Maureen G; Ying, Gui-Shuang; Lin, Meng C; Bunya, Vatinee Y; Dana, Reza; Asbell, Penny A; Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) Study Research Group | Abstract: SIGNIFICANCE:Identification of the association of specific signs of dry eye disease with specific visual function deficits may allow for more targeted approaches to treatment. PURPOSE:The purpose of this study was to explore the association of dry eye signs and symptoms with visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management study. METHODS:Baseline data from participants in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management study were used in this secondary cross-sectional analysis. Standardized procedures were used to obtain results on the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), high-contrast logMAR VA, contrast sensitivity, tear film debris, tear breakup time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining, meibomian gland evaluation, conjunctival lissamine green staining, and Schirmer test scores. Generalized linear models that included age, refractive error status, and cataract status were used to assess the association between VA and contrast sensitivity with OSDI score and each dry eye sign. The Hochberg procedure was used to account for multiple comparisons. RESULTS:Among 487 participants (974 eyes), worse VA was associated with worse mean score on the OSDI vision subscale (39.4 for VA 20/32 or worse vs. 32.4 for VA 20/16 or better; adjusted linear trend, P = .02); scores were not associated with contrast sensitivity. Severe meibomian gland plugging and abnormal secretions were associated with worse mean log contrast sensitivity (1.48 for severe vs. 1.54 for not plugged [P = .04] and 1.49 for obstructed vs. 1.57 for clear [P = .002], respectively). Longer TBUT was associated with better mean log contrast sensitivity (1.57 for TBUT g5 seconds and 1.51 for TBUT ≤2 seconds, P l .0001). CONCLUSIONS:Worse VA rather than worse contrast sensitivity drives vision-related symptoms in dry eye. Greater tear film instability was associated with worse contrast sensitivity.
Databáze: OpenAIRE