Food Simulating Organic Solvents for Evaluating Crosslink Density of Bulk Fill Composite Resin
| Autor: | Maryam Hussain Buholayka, Neveen M. Ayad, Eman Hussain Al Kaba, Hala A. Bahgat |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
chemistry.chemical_classification
Ketone Materials science Article Subject Organic solvent Bulk fill composite technology industry and agriculture 030206 dentistry 02 engineering and technology macromolecular substances 021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology lcsh:RK1-715 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine chemistry lcsh:Dentistry Vickers hardness test 0210 nano-technology General Dentistry Nuclear chemistry Research Article |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Dentistry International Journal of Dentistry, Vol 2017 (2017) |
| ISSN: | 1687-8736 1687-8728 |
| Popis: | Objectives.To evaluate crosslink densities of two bulk fill composite resins and determine if the used Food Simulating Organic Solvent (FSOS) affected them.Methods.Forty specimens were prepared from SureFill and SonicFill bulk fill composite resins, 20 each. All specimens were stored dry for 24 h. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups: stored in ethanol (E) 75% or in methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) 100% for 24 h. Crosslink density was evaluated by calculating the difference between the Vickers hardness numbers of the specimens stored dry and after their storage in FSOS. The data were statistically analyzed usingt-test.Results.The means of crosslink density in E and MEK were 6.99% and 9.44% for SureFill and 10.54% and 11.92% for SonicFill, respectively.t-test displayed significant differences between crosslink densities of SureFill and SonicFill: (P<0.0001) in E and (P=0.02) in MEK and between crosslink densities of SureFill in E and MEK (P=0.02).Conclusions.Crosslink density of bulk fill composite resin can be evaluated using E or MEK. SureFill has higher crosslink density than SonicFill in both E and MEK. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text