Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in non‐ischemic cardiomyopathy is unrelated to medical therapy

Autor: Samy Elayi, Hesham R. Omar, You W. Lin, Gregory Sinner, Maya Guglin
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Heart Ventricles
medicine.medical_treatment
Clinical Investigations
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Cardiomyopathy
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Ventricular Function
Left

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Electrocardiography
03 medical and health sciences
QRS complex
0302 clinical medicine
Internal medicine
Statistical significance
medicine
Humans
cardiovascular diseases
030212 general & internal medicine
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Ejection fraction
business.industry
Left bundle branch block
Non ischemic cardiomyopathy
Stroke Volume
General Medicine
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Treatment Outcome
Echocardiography
cardiovascular system
Cardiology
Female
Cardiomyopathies
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
Medical therapy
Follow-Up Studies
circulatory and respiratory physiology
Zdroj: Clinical Cardiology. 42:143-150
ISSN: 1932-8737
0160-9289
DOI: 10.1002/clc.23123
Popis: INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend at least 3 months of guideline‐directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with a new onset of non‐ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) prior to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). For patients who do not receive optimal GDMT, response to CRT is unknown. METHODS: Patients with NICM and LBBB with QRS ≥ 120 ms were identified among all patients who underwent CRT. Patients who received GDMT for ≥ 3 months before CRT were compared to those who did not. Among 38 patients who met inclusion criteria, 24 received optimal GDMT prior to implantation (Group 1) and 14 did not (Group 2). RESULTS: QRS narrowing occurred in Group 1 (160 ± 9 ms to 138 ± 20 ms, P = 0.001) and Group 2 (160 ± 17 ms to 139 ± 30 ms, P = 0.021). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement occurred in Group 1 (21.3 ± 5.9% to 34.4 ± 13.9%, P < 0.001) and Group 2 (18.8 ± 4.7% to 31.1 ± 13%, P = 0.010). QRS interval and LVEF changes were similar between groups (P = NS). There was a trend towards greater CRT response in women than in men, although differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In patients with NICM and LBBB, CRT is associated with improvements in LV size and function independent of prior GDMT. The ability of resynchronization to improve LVEF without GDMT suggests that CRT without waiting 3 months for GDMT optimization may benefit some patients with NICM and LBBB.
Databáze: OpenAIRE