Satisfaction with and usage of a hand neuroprosthesis
| Autor: | P. Hunter Peckham, Kathryn Stroh Wuolle, Clayton L. Van Doren, Kevin L. Kilgore, Michael W. Keith, Julie Grill, Anne M. Bryden |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1999 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Activities of daily living Neuroprosthetics Adolescent medicine.medical_treatment Psychological intervention Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Electric Stimulation Therapy Prosthesis Prosthesis Implantation Disability Evaluation Patient satisfaction Quality of life Forearm Outcome Assessment Health Care medicine Humans Spinal Cord Injuries business.industry Rehabilitation Outcome measures Middle Aged Patient Acceptance of Health Care Hand Electrodes Implanted medicine.anatomical_structure Motor Skills Patient Satisfaction Physical therapy Quality of Life Female business |
| Zdroj: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 80(2) |
| ISSN: | 0003-9993 |
| Popis: | Objective: To measure the satisfaction with, clinical impact of, and use of an implantable hand neuroprosthesis. Setting: Eight different medical centers. Participants: Thirty-four individuals with spinal cord injuries at the C5 or C6 motor level. Interventions: Participants were implemented with a hand neuroprosthesis that provides grasp and release. The neuroprosthesis includes a surgically implanted stimulator, implanted electrodes sutured to the hand and forearm muscles, and an externally mounted controller. Main Outcome Measure: A survey was mailed to study participants, who were asked to respond to statements such as “If I had it to do over, I would have the hand system implanted again,” using a 5-level Likert scale (“strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”). Results: Eighty-seven percent of participants were very satisfied with the neuroprosthesis, 88% reported a positive impact on their life, 87% reported improvements in activities of daily living, and 81% reported improved independence. Participants reported using the neuroprosthesis a median of 5.5 days per week; 15 participants used the neuroprosthesis 7 days per week, and 5 participants reported not using the device. Conclusions: The neuroprosthesis was used by most participants. The neuroprosthesis performed satisfactorily, increased users' ability to perform activities of daily living and independence, and improved their quality of life. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|