Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study

Autor: Erik H. VanIterson, Theodore W. Zderic, Marc T. Hamilton, Susan M. Gapstur, Juned Siddique, Danielle M. Thomas, Lynette L. Craft
Rok vydání: 2012
Předmět:
Adult
Gerontology
medicine.medical_specialty
Cross-sectional study
Health Behavior
Physical fitness
Physical activity
Monitoring
Ambulatory

Medicine (miscellaneous)
Behavioural sciences
Guidelines as Topic
Physical Therapy
Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Walking
Sitting
Body Mass Index
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Surveys and Questionnaires
medicine
Humans
Stepping
030212 general & internal medicine
lcsh:RC620-627
Aged
Sedentary lifestyle
Nutrition and Dietetics
Non-exercise physical activity
business.industry
Research
lcsh:Public aspects of medicine
lcsh:RA1-1270
030229 sport sciences
Middle Aged
Inactivity physiology
Sedentary behavior
lcsh:Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases
Cross-Sectional Studies
Physical therapy
Women's Health
Female
Observational study
business
Standing
human activities
Body mass index
Zdroj: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol 9, Iss 1, p 122 (2012)
The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
ISSN: 1479-5868
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-122
Popis: Background The inactivity physiology paradigm proposes that sedentary behaviors, including sitting too much, are independent of the type of physical activity delineated for health in the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Thus, we hypothesized that, when accounting for behaviors across the entire day, variability in the amount of time spent sitting would be independent of the inter-and intra-individual time engaged in sustained moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Methods Ninety-one healthy women, aged 40–75 years, completed a demographic questionnaire and assessment of height and weight. Participants wore the activPAL activity monitor for one week and time (minutes/day) spent sitting, standing, stepping, and in sustained bouts (bouts ≥10 minutes) of MVPA were quantified. The women were then stratified into groups based on weekly sustained MVPA. Additionally, each day of data collection for each participant was classified as either a “sufficient” MVPA day (≥ 30 min of MVPA) or an “insufficient” MVPA day for within-participant analyses. Results Time spent sitting, standing, and in incidental non-exercise stepping averaged 64, 28, and 11 hrs/week, respectively, and did not differ between groups with individuals meeting/exceeding the current exercise recommendation of 150 min/week of sustained MVPA in ≥10 minutes bouts (M = 294 min/week, SD = 22) compared to those with none or minimal levels (M= 20min/week, SD = 4). Time spent sitting (M = 9.1 hr/day, SD = 0.19 vs. M = 8.8 hr/day, SD = 0.22), standing (M = 3.9 hr/day, SD = 0.16 vs. M = 3.9 hr/day, SD = 0.15), and in intermittent stepping (M = 1.6 hr/day, SD = 0.07 vs. M = 1.6 hr/day, SD = 0.06) did not differ between days with (~55 min/day) and without recommended MVPA. Conclusions This study provides the first objective evidence that participation in sustained MVPA is unrelated to daily sitting duration in relatively healthy, middle and older-aged women. More research is needed to extend these findings to other populations and to inform distinct behavioral recommendations focused on sedentary time.
Databáze: OpenAIRE