Clinical Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies for Prosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Ankle Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
| Autor: | Ashley W Blom, Matthew C. Barrett, Setor K Kunutsor, Michael R Whitehouse |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Reoperation
arthrodesis medicine.medical_specialty Prosthesis-Related Infections medicine.medical_treatment Arthrodesis Ankle replacement MEDLINE two-stage revision Cochrane Library Arthroplasty Replacement Ankle 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans Orthopedics and Sports Medicine prosthetic joint infection Arthritis Infectious 030222 orthopedics business.industry one-stage revision 030229 sport sciences Surgery meta-analysis Treatment Outcome medicine.anatomical_structure Debridement Amputation Centre for Surgical Research ankle replacement Meta-analysis Implant Ankle business Ankle Joint |
| Zdroj: | Kunutsor, S K, Barrett, M C, Whitehouse, M R & Blom, A W 2020, ' Clinical Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies for Prosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Ankle Replacement : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis ', Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 367-372 . https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2019.04.016 |
| ISSN: | 1067-2516 |
| DOI: | 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.04.016 |
| Popis: | Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total ankle replacement (TAR) is a challenging complication, which often requires debridement and implant retention (DAIR) with or without polyethylene exchange, revision surgery, implantation of a cement spacer, conversion to arthrodesis, or even amputation. The optimum treatment for ankle PJI is not well established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical effectiveness of various treatment strategies for infected ankle prostheses. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to December 2018 for studies evaluating the impact of treatment in patient populations with infected ankle prostheses following TAR. Binary data were pooled after arcsine transformation. Six citations comprising 17 observational design comparisons were included. The reinfection rates (95% confidence intervals) for DAIR with or without polyethylene exchange, 1-stage revision, 2-stage revision, cement spacer, and arthrodesis were 39.8% (24.4 to 56.1), 0.0% (0.0 to 78.7), 0.0% (0.0 to 8.5), 0.2% (0.0 to 17.9), and 13.6% (0.0 to 45.8), respectively. Rates of amputation for DAIR with or without polyethylene exchange and cement spacer were 5.6% (0.0 to 16.9) and 22.2% (6.3 to 54.7), respectively. Measures of function, pain, and satisfaction could not be compared because of limited data. One- and 2-stage revision strategies seem to be associated with the lowest reinfection rates, but these findings are based on limited data. Arthrodesis and DAIR with or without polyethylene exchange appear to be commonly used in treating infected ankle prosthesis, but are associated with poor infection control. Clear gaps exist in the literature, and further research is warranted to evaluate treatment strategies for infected ankle prosthesis. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect