META Score
Autor: | Uwe Klinge, Koen Chiers, Verónica Gómez-Gil, René H. Fortelny, Alexander H. Petter-Puchner, J. F. Lange, Nicole D. Bouvy, C. R. Deeken, Marc Miserez, E. Altinli, Karl A. LeBlanc, E. Reynvoet, Marc H. F. Schreinemacher, Jan Greve, Aude Vanlander, S. Gruber-Blum, L. C. L. van den Hil, R. Kaufmann, Frederik Berrevoet, E. H. H. Mommers, Joanna W. A. M. Bosmans, Salvador Morales-Conde |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Surgery, RS: NUTRIM - R1 - Obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular health, RS: NUTRIM - R2 - Liver and digestive health, MUMC+: MA AIOS Heelkunde (9), MUMC+: MA Heelkunde (9) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Scoring system Consensus Delphi Technique SURGERY Modified delphi MEDLINE Tissue Adhesions 030230 surgery 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Hernia surgery Postoperative Complications Medicine Humans Medical physics Tissue Adhesion business.industry Comparability Surgical Mesh Future study 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Organ involvement Female business |
Zdroj: | World Journal of Surgery, 44(9), 2935-2943. Springer New York World Journal of Surgery, 44(9). Springer, Cham |
ISSN: | 0364-2313 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00268-020-05568-1 |
Popis: | Background Currently, the lack of consensus on postoperative mesh-tissue adhesion scoring leads to incomparable scientific results. The aim of this study was to develop an adhesion score recognized by experts in the field of hernia surgery. Methods Authors of three or more previously published articles on both mesh-tissue adhesion scores and postoperative adhesions were marked as experts. They were queried on seven items using a modified Delphi method. The items concerned the utility of adhesion scoring models, the appropriateness of macroscopic and microscopic variables, the range and use of composite scores or subscores, adhesion-related complications and follow-up length. This study comprised two questionnaire-based rounds and one consensus meeting. Results The first round was completed by 23 experts (82%), the second round by 18 experts (64%). Of those 18 experts, ten were able to participate in the final consensus meeting and all approved the final proposal. From a total of 158 items, consensus was reached on 90 items. The amount of mesh surface covered with adhesions, tenacity and thickness of adhesions and organ involvement was concluded to be a minimal set of variables to be communicated separately in each future study on mesh adhesions. Conclusion The MEsh Tissue Adhesion scoring system is the first consensus-based scoring system with a wide backing of renowned experts and can be used to assess mesh-related adhesions. By including this minimal set of variables in future research interstudy comparability and objectivity can be increased and eventually linked to clinically relevant outcomes. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |