Improving Quality of Carotid Interventions: Identifying Hospital-Level Structural Factors that can Improve Outcomes
Autor: | Dylan R. Morris, Richard Bulbulia, Prem Chana, Alison Halliday, Kamran Gaba |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Carotid Artery Diseases
Cardiovascular event Stroke rate medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors Critical Care Heart Diseases Cost-Benefit Analysis medicine.medical_treatment Specialty Psychological intervention Carotid endarterectomy 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Risk Assessment 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Risk Factors Humans Medicine Hospital Mortality Hospital Costs Stroke Quality Indicators Health Care Endarterectomy Carotid Sicus biology business.industry Endovascular Procedures Hospital level General Medicine General Review Length of Stay biology.organism_classification medicine.disease Quality Improvement Outcome and Process Assessment Health Care Treatment Outcome Hospital Bed Capacity Emergency medicine Stents Surgery Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business |
Zdroj: | Annals of Vascular Surgery |
ISSN: | 0890-5096 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.066 |
Popis: | Background “Structural factors” relating to organization of hospitals may affect procedural outcomes. This study's aim was to clarify associations between structural factors and outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid endarterectomy stenting (CAS). Methods A systematic review of studies published in English since 2005 was conducted. Structural factors assessed were as follows: population size served by the vascular department; number of hospital beds; availability of dedicated vascular beds; established clinical pathways; surgical intensive care unit (SICU) size; and specialty of surgeon/interventionalist. Primary outcomes were as follows: mortality; stroke; cardiac complications; length of hospital stay (LOS); and cost. Results There were 11 studies (n = 95,100 patients) included in this systematic review. For CEA, reduced mortality (P 75,000 people. Larger hospitals were associated with lower mortality, stroke rate, and cardiac events, compared with smaller hospitals (less than 130 beds). Provision of vascular beds after CEA was associated with lower mortality (P = 0.0008) and fewer cardiac events (P = 0.03). Adherence to established clinical pathways was associated with reduced stroke and cardiac event rates while reducing CEA costs. Large SICUs (≥7 beds) and dedicated intensivists were associated with decreased mortality after CEA while a large SICU was associated with reduced stroke rate (P = 0.001). Vascular surgeons performing CEA were associated with lower stroke rates and shorter LOS (P = 0.0001) than other specialists. CAS outcomes were not influenced by specialty but costless when performed by vascular surgeons (P Highlights • The organization of hospitals may affect carotid interventional outcomes. • Large vascular units with defined clinical pathways had improved surgical outcomes. • Vascular surgeons had best outcomes after carotid interventions. • These findings may reduce risks and costs associated with carotid interventions. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |