c-Myb and Members of the c-Ets Family of Transcription Factors Act as Molecular Switches to Mediate Opposite Steroid Regulation of the Human Glucocorticoid Receptor 1A Promoter

Autor: Wayne V. Vedeckis, Chuan Dong Geng
Rok vydání: 2005
Předmět:
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
T-Lymphocytes
Blotting
Western

Apoptosis
Biology
Transfection
Models
Biological

Polymerase Chain Reaction
complex mixtures
Biochemistry
Jurkat cells
Cell Line
Proto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-2
Proto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1
Jurkat Cells
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myb
chemistry.chemical_compound
Receptors
Glucocorticoid

Glucocorticoid receptor
Proto-Oncogene Proteins
Humans
Cell Lineage
MYB
Lymphocytes
Luciferases
Promoter Regions
Genetic

Molecular Biology
Transcription factor
Genes
Dominant

B-Lymphocytes
Reporter gene
Leukemia
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ets
Lymphoblast
Exons
Cell Biology
Molecular biology
Protein Structure
Tertiary

Up-Regulation
DNA-Binding Proteins
Electroporation
Gene Expression Regulation
chemistry
Trans-Activators
Steroids
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
DNA
Protein Binding
Transcription Factors
Zdroj: Journal of Biological Chemistry. 280:43264-43271
ISSN: 0021-9258
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m508245200
Popis: Steroid auto-regulation of the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR) 1A promoter in lymphoblast cells resides largely in two DNA elements (footprints 11 and 12). We show here that c-Myb and c-Ets family members (Ets-1/2, PU.1, and Spi-B) control hGR 1A promoter regulation in T- and B-lymphoblast cells. Two T-lymphoblast lines, CEM-C7 and Jurkat, contain high levels of c-Myb and low levels of PU.1, whereas the opposite is true in IM-9 B-lymphoblasts. In Jurkat cells, overexpression of c-Ets-1, c-Ets-2, or PU.1 effectively represses dexamethasone-mediated up-regulation of an hGR 1A promoter-luciferase reporter gene, as do dominant negative c-Myb (c-Myb DNA-binding domain) or Ets proteins (Ets-2 DNA-binding domain). Overexpression of c-Myb in IM-9 cells confers hormone-dependent up-regulation to the hGR 1A promoter reporter gene. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays show that hormone treatment causes the recruitment of hGR and c-Myb to the hGR 1A promoter in CEM-C7 cells, whereas hGR and PU.1 are recruited to this promoter in IM-9 cells. These observations suggest that the specific transcription factor that binds to footprint 12, when hGR binds to the adjacent footprint 11, determines the direction of hGR 1A promoter auto-regulation. This leads to a "molecular switch" model for auto-regulation of the hGR 1A promoter.
Databáze: OpenAIRE