(13)N-ammonia myocardial perfusion imaging with a PET/CT scanner: impact on clinical decision making and cost-effectiveness

Autor: Martina Knabenhans, Ines Valenta, Hatem Alkadhi, Oliver Gaemperli, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Patrick T. Siegrist, Hans Scheffel, Lars Husmann, Tobias Hoefflinghaus, Paul Stolzmann
Přispěvatelé: University of Zurich
Rok vydání: 2008
Předmět:
Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Cost effectiveness
Cost-Benefit Analysis
medicine.medical_treatment
Population
610 Medicine & health
Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary artery disease
Myocardial perfusion imaging
Ammonia
Prevalence
Humans
2741 Radiology
Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Medicine
Radiology
Nuclear Medicine and imaging

education
Aged
Aged
80 and over

PET-CT
education.field_of_study
Nitrogen Isotopes
medicine.diagnostic_test
10042 Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
business.industry
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Health Care Costs
10181 Clinic for Nuclear Medicine
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Decision Support Systems
Clinical

medicine.disease
Transplantation
Positron-Emission Tomography
Subtraction Technique
10076 Center for Integrative Human Physiology
Conventional PCI
570 Life sciences
biology
Female
Radiology
Radiopharmaceuticals
Tomography
X-Ray Computed

business
Switzerland
DOI: 10.5167/uzh-3622
Popis: Purpose: The purpose of the study is to determine the impact of 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) on clinical decision making and its cost-effectiveness. Materials and methods: One hundred consecutive patients (28 women, 72 men; mean age 60.9 ± 12.0years; range 24-85years) underwent 13N-ammonia PET scanning (and computed tomography, used only for attenuation correction) to assess myocardial perfusion in patients with known (n = 79) or suspected (n = 8) coronary artery disease (CAD), or for suspected small-vessel disease (SVD; n = 13). Before PET, the referring physician was asked to determine patient treatment if PET would not be available. Four weeks later, PET patient management was reassessed for each patient individually. Results: Before PET management strategies would have been: diagnostic angiography (62 of 100 patients), diagnostic angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; 6 of 100), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; 3 of 100), transplantation (1 of 100), or conservative medical treatment (28 of 100). After PET scanning, treatment strategies were altered in 78 patients leading to: diagnostic angiography (0 of 100), PCI (20 of 100), CABG (3 of 100), transplantation (1 of 100), or conservative medical treatment (76 of 100). Patient management followed the recommendations of PET findings in 97% of the cases. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed lower costs of €206/patient as a result of PET scanning. Conclusion: In a population with a high prevalence of known CAD, PET is cost-effective and has an important impact on patient management
Databáze: OpenAIRE