A comparative evaluation of treatment methods for bile duct stones after hepaticojejunostomy between percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy and peroral, short double-balloon enteroscopy
| Autor: | Hiroyuki Okada, Hiroyuki Seki, Daisuke Uchida, Takeshi Tomoda, Shuntaro Yabe, Hirofumi Kawamoto, Koichiro Tsutsumi, Naoki Yamamoto, Yutaka Akimoto, Sho Mizukawa, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Hironari Kato, Shigeru Horiguchi |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Percutaneous hepaticojejunostomy Comparative evaluation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Double-balloon enteroscopy double-balloon enteroscopy medicine lcsh:RC799-869 common bile duct gallstones Original Research percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic treatment choledochojejunostomy medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Bile duct Gastroenterology Treatment method Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy medicine.anatomical_structure 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis lcsh:Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Radiology business |
| Zdroj: | Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, Vol 10 (2017) |
| ISSN: | 1756-2848 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/1756283x16674633 |
| Popis: | Background: Bile duct stones after hepaticojejunostomy are considered a troublesome adverse event. Although percutaneous transhepatic procedures using a cholangioscopy is performed to treat these bile duct stones, a peroral endoscopic procedure using a short, double-balloon enteroscope (sDBE) is an alternative. This study aimed to compare the immediate and long-term outcomes of both treatments for bile duct stones in patients who underwent prior hepaticojejunostomy. Methods: Between October 2001 and May 2013, 40 consecutive patients were treated for bile duct stones after hepaticojejunostomy at a tertiary care hospital. Initial success with biliary access, biliary intervention-related technical success, clinical success, adverse events, hospitalization duration, and stone-free survival were retrospectively evaluated. Results: The initial success rates for biliary access were 100% (8/8) with percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS) and 91% (29/32) with sDBE. In three patients in whom biliary access during initial sDBE failed, successful access with subsequent PTCS was achieved, and biliary intervention-related technical success and clinical success were eventually achieved in all 40 patients. The rate of adverse events was significantly lower with sDBE than with PTCS (10% versus 45%; p = 0.025). The median hospitalization duration for complete stone clearance was significantly shorter with sDBE than with PTCS (10 versus 35 days; p < 0.001). During the median 7.2 year or 3.1 year follow up, the probabilities of being stone-free at 1, 2, and 3 years were 100%, 73%, and 64% for PTCS and 85%, 65%, and 59% for sDBE, respectively ( p = 0.919). Conclusions: sDBE was useful, with few adverse events and short hospitalization; therefore, experienced endoscopists can consider it as first-line treatment for bile duct stones in patients with prior hepaticojejunostomy. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|