Bypass graft to the midpopliteal artery with a combined anterior and posterior approach
| Autor: | Wayne S. Gradman, William Cohen, Massoud Haji-Aghaii, Judith Laub |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2001 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Reoperation medicine.medical_specialty Prosthesis-Related Infections Popliteal fossa medicine.medical_treatment Arterial Occlusive Diseases Femoral artery Anastomosis Revascularization Iliac Artery Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation Axillary artery medicine.artery medicine Humans Popliteal Artery Vein Aged Retrospective Studies business.industry Common iliac artery Popliteal artery Surgery Femoral Artery medicine.anatomical_structure Axillary Artery Female Radiology business Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Vascular Surgical Procedures |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Vascular Surgery. 33(4):888-894 |
| ISSN: | 0741-5214 |
| DOI: | 10.1067/mva.2001.111745 |
| Popis: | Purpose: The medial supragenicular and infragenicular approaches to the popliteal artery were introduced almost 50 years ago and replaced the posterior approach to the popliteal artery for distal graft implantation. We review a contemporary series of bypass grafts to the midpopliteal artery by use of a combined anterior and posterior approach to evaluate its potential clinical benefits. Technique: After the proximal graft anastomosis is constructed, an incision is made in the popliteal fossa to access the midpopliteal artery, the graft is passed into that incision, and all but the popliteal incision is closed. The patient is turned, the midpopliteal artery dissection is completed, and the graft is anastomosed distally. Methods: Fifty-seven bypass grafts, implanted distally on the midpopliteal artery by this technique over a 13-year period, chosen in preference to an infragenicular bypass graft in selected patients when a supragenicular bypass was not feasible, were assessed in terms of indications for surgery, conduit type, complications, length of postoperative hospitalization, and graft patency. Results: Bypass grafting originated from the axillary artery in two cases, the common iliac artery in one case, and the femoral artery in 54 cases. The procedure was performed in five patients with a popliteal trifurcation anomaly, nine patients with a blind popliteal segment, 20 patients with limited length of autologous vein, and five patients with an above-knee graft infection requiring an alternate path for revascularization. Autologous vein was used in 35 and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in 19 bypass grafts. Three other patients had a composite sequential femoral-popliteal-tibial bypass graft, with PTFE and autologous vein. Postoperative (30 day) complications include one death (composite sequential), one stroke (PTFE), and one graft thrombosis (saphenous vein). The mean postoperative hospitalization for the last 31 patients was 4.2 ± 3.7 days. In the autologous vein group, the 1-year primary patency rate was 87%, and the primary assisted patency rate was 94%. In the PTFE group, the 1-year primary patency rate was 72%. Two composite sequential grafts remained patent at 1 year. Conclusions: Bypass grafting to the midpopliteal artery with a combined anterior and posterior approach offers a safe and effective option to below-knee bypass grafting when an above-knee bypass grafting is not feasible. Compared with the medial infragenicular incision, the posterior incision results in reduced morbidity rates, rapid mobilization, and early hospital discharge. (J Vasc Surg 2001;33:888-94.) |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|