How to deal with the high condition number of the noise covariance matrix of gravity field functionals synthesised from a satellite-only global gravity field model?
| Autor: | Roland Klees, D. C. Slobbe, H. Hashemi Farahani |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Covariance matrix Global gravity field model Estimator Unified theory of least-squares 010502 geochemistry & geophysics 01 natural sciences Least squares Regularisation Noise Singular value Geophysics Local quasi-geoid Gravitational field Geochemistry and Petrology Noise covariance matrix Applied mathematics Original Article Spherical radial basis functions Computers in Earth Sciences Unified field theory Condition number Least-squares 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Mathematics |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Geodesy, 93 (2019) Journal of Geodesy |
| ISSN: | 1432-1394 0949-7714 |
| Popis: | The posed question arises for instance in regional gravity field modelling using weighted least-squares techniques if the gravity field functionals are synthesised from the spherical harmonic coefficients of a satellite-only global gravity model (GGM), and are used as one of the noisy datasets. The associated noise covariance matrix, appeared to be extremely ill-conditioned with a singular value spectrum that decayed gradually to zero without any noticeable gap. We analysed three methods to deal with the ill-conditioned noise covariance matrix: Tihonov regularisation of the noise covariance matrix in combination with the standard formula for the weighted least-squares estimator, a formula of the weighted least-squares estimator, which does not involve the inverse noise covariance matrix, and an estimator based on Rao’s unified theory of least-squares. Our analysis was based on a numerical experiment involving a set of height anomalies synthesised from the GGM GOCO05s, which is provided with a full noise covariance matrix. We showed that the three estimators perform similar, provided that the two regularisation parameters each method knows were chosen properly. As standard regularisation parameter choice rules do not apply here, we suggested a new parameter choice rule, and demonstrated its performance. Using this rule, we found that the differences between the three least-squares estimates were within noise. For the standard formulation of the weighted least-squares estimator with regularised noise covariance matrix, this required an exceptionally strong regularisation, much larger than one expected from the condition number of the noise covariance matrix. The preferred method is the inversion-free formulation of the weighted least-squares estimator, because of its simplicity with respect to the choice of the two regularisation parameters. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink