Microbiology of Explanted Suture Segments from Infected and Noninfected Surgical Patients
| Autor: | Stephen Rothenburger, John Collier, Matthew I. Goldblatt, Mary Beth Graham, Charles E. Edmiston, Richard M. Marks, Gary R. Seabrook, Peter J. Rossi, Candace J. Krepel, James R. Sanger |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
Microbiology (medical)
biology Sutures Pseudomonas aeruginosa Skin flora Bacteriology Bacterial Infections biology.organism_classification medicine.disease_cause Peptostreptococcus Microbiology Bacteria Aerobic Bacteria Anaerobic Postoperative Complications Enterococcus Suture (anatomy) Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms medicine Humans Bacteroides fragilis |
| Popis: | Sutures under selective host/environmental factors can potentiate postoperative surgical site infection (SSI). The present investigation characterized microbial recovery and biofilm formation from explanted absorbable (AB) and nonabsorbable (NAB) sutures from infected and noninfected sites. AB and NAB sutures were harvested from noninfected (70.9%) and infected (29.1%) sites in 158 patients. At explantation, devices were sonicated and processed for qualitative/quantitative bacteriology; selective sutures were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Bacteria were recovered from 85 (53.8%) explanted sites; 39 sites were noninfected, and 46 were infected. Suture recovery ranged from 11.1 to 574.6 days postinsertion. A significant difference in mean microbial recovery between noninfected (1.2 isolates) and infected (2.7 isolates) devices ( P < 0.05) was noted. Staphylococcus epidermidis , Staphylococcus aureus , coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), Peptostreptococcus spp., Bacteroides fragilis , Escherichia coli , Enterococcus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Serratia spp. were recovered from infected devices, while commensal skin flora was recovered from noninfected devices. No significant difference in quantitative microbial recovery between infected monofilament and multifilament sutures was noted. Biofilm was present in 100% and 66.6% of infected and noninfected devices, respectively ( P < 0.042). We conclude that both monofilament and braided sutures provide a hospitable surface for microbial adherence: (i) a significant difference in microbial recovery from infected and noninfected sutures was noted, (ii) infected sutures harbored a mixed flora, including multidrug-resistant health care-associated pathogens, and (iii) a significant difference in the presence or absence of a biofilm in infected versus noninfected explanted devices was noted. Further studies to document the benefit of focused risk reduction strategies to minimize suture contamination and biofilm formation postimplantation are warranted. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|