Preparing Whistleblowers for Reporting Research Misconduct
| Autor: | David E. Wright, Jacqueline Amoozegar, Arthur J. Bonito, Sandra L. Titus, Celia Eicheldinger, Angela M. Greene |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2012 |
| Předmět: |
Boot camp
Research ethics Truth Disclosure Whistleblowing business.industry Data Collection Scientific Misconduct Research integrity Pilot Projects General Medicine Library and Information Sciences Public relations Ethics Research Education Officer Bias Mental Recall Humans Confidentiality business Psychology Scientific misconduct Allegation |
| Zdroj: | Accountability in Research. 19:308-328 |
| ISSN: | 1545-5815 0898-9621 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/08989621.2012.718683 |
| Popis: | Making an allegation of research misconduct can be stressful for a whistleblower. The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) can play an important role in helping reduce the stress by thoroughly discussing what whistleblowers can expect if they make an allegation. Through interviews with 77 RIOs who had recently handled a research misconduct case, we found that RIOs who addressed more topics as well as specific aspects of the topics were more likely to have used some type of memory aide in their initial contact with whistleblowers, talked with ORI staff or other RIOs about "hypothetical" research misconduct cases, or attended a RIO boot camp training. We believe that RIOs who more fully inform whistleblowers are providing timely preparation and building whistleblowers' confidence so they can make a more informed decision about reporting and experience less stress. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
| Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |