Reflections on science advisory systems in Canada
| Autor: | Ramia Jabr, Remi Quirion, Paul Dufour, Arthur J. Carty |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Government
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences business.industry General Arts and Humanities media_common.quotation_subject General Social Sciences Foundation (evidence) Public policy 010501 environmental sciences Public relations 01 natural sciences Scientific evidence Public interest State (polity) Law Ideology Sociology business General Economics Econometrics and Finance Sophistication General Psychology 0105 earth and related environmental sciences media_common |
| Zdroj: | Palgrave Communications. |
| ISSN: | 2055-1045 |
| DOI: | 10.1057/palcomms.2016.48 |
| Popis: | As the evolution of our world has triggered complexity and technological sophistication, it is now essential to consider sound scientific evidence as an integral element of decision-making. Science advisers or chief scientists have to take into account many factors in giving advice. Depending on the nature and level of advice, factors such as the ideology of the governing body, the state of the social, economic and scientific development in the country or region, potential impacts on the health, environment and security of the community, the balance of risk and reward in various options, must all be considered. Canada has lived through a few of these issues in its recent experience with science advice and advisory systems. This article will elaborate on the impact and influence of changes in science advisory bodies at the federal and Quebec government levels and will provide a perspective on their impact. It examines the historical evolution of the advisory apparatus for science throughout Canada’s history and underscores some of their successes and failures under different regimes. The conclusion drawn in this article is that science and science advisory systems in Canada have lacked continuity and a solid foundation thus weakening efforts to enable sound science-based policy into decision-making. The article argues for a more institutionalized and pluralistic approach to ensuring that evidence and science advice can endure—both at the federal and provincial levels. In many ways, the experience with these advisory mechanisms suggests a growing need to ensure sound advice within increasingly complex decision-making as well as a demand by citizens to have scientific evidence considered more carefully in public policy and for the public interest. This article is published as part of a collection on scientific advice to governments. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink