Outcomes in CME/CPD - Special Collection Standardising Outcomes Assessment: Demonstrating the Power of Comparative Outcomes Data
| Autor: | Richie Castles, Megan Becker, Scott Williams, Wendy Cerenzia, Desirae Janowiak, Annette Triebel |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Medical education
lcsh:LC8-6691 lcsh:R5-920 Data collection aggregate outcomes data standardised outcomes evaluation tool lcsh:Special aspects of education Standardized approach cme comparative outcomes data Continuing education Patient care Outcomes evaluation Collective impact cme evaluation outcomes data Aggregate data Special Collection on Outcomes in CME/CPD standardised outcomes evaluation Psychology lcsh:Medicine (General) comparative outcomes data Research Article |
| Zdroj: | Journal of European CME, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2020) Journal of European CME article-version (VoR) Version of Record |
| ISSN: | 2161-4083 |
| Popis: | One challenge in medical education is the inability to compare and aggregate outcomes data across continuing educational activities due to variations in evaluation tools, data collection approaches and reporting. To address this challenge, Gilead collaborated with CE Outcomes to develop, pilot, and implement a standardized outcomes evaluation across Gilead directed medical education activities around the world. Development of the standardized tool occurred during late 2018, with Gilead stakeholders invited to provide input on the questions and structure of the evaluation form. Once input was captured, a draft evaluation tool was developed and circulated for feedback. Questions were created to collect 1) participant demographic characteristics 2)data on planned changes to practice, key learnings and anticipated barriers, and 3) learner satisfaction with content and perceived achievement of learning objectives. The evaluation tool was piloted in H1 2019 across 7 medical education activities. Revisions based on pilot feedback were incorporated. The evaluation tool was broadly released during H2 2019 and data were collected from over 30 educational activities. By the end of 2019, it was possible to compare outcomes results from individual activities and aggregate data to demonstrate overall educational reach and impact. Continuing education activities provide valuable up-to-date information to clinicians with the goal of improving patient care. While often challenging to highlight the impact of education due to variations in outcomes, this standardized approach establishes a method to collect meaningful outcomes data that demonstrates the collective impact of continuing education and allows for comparison across individual activities. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
| Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |