On investigating inner experience: Contrasting Moore & Schwitzgebel and Brouwers et al
| Autor: | Russell T. Hurlburt |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Experience sampling method
media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Small sample Ambiguity 050105 experimental psychology Presupposition Epistemology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Reading Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Phenomenon Reading (process) Developmental and Educational Psychology Humans 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Bracketing Psychology 030217 neurology & neurosurgery media_common |
| Zdroj: | Consciousness and Cognition. 63:146-150 |
| ISSN: | 1053-8100 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.concog.2018.06.018 |
| Popis: | Moore and Schwitzgebel (this issue) reported that readers report innerly speak the text about 59% of the time. Brouwers et al. (2018) reported that readers innerly speak the text only about 3% of the time. I use this huge discrepancy as a case study to discuss important issues in the investigation of inner experience, including: the training of participants; ambiguity in the time being considered; ambiguity in the phenomenon; the desirability of investigating the phenomenon itself, not merely its frequency; bracketing presuppositions; the advantages and disadvantages of large and small sample sizes; influence by the investigator; and the slide from phenomena to reports of phenomena. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect