Prostate cancer risk and exposure to pesticides in British Columbia Farmers
| Autor: | Barbara Lang, Richard P. Gallagher, Joel L. Bert, Raymond Fang, Zenaida Abanto, Nhu D. Le, Pierre R. Band |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2010 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Urology Job-exposure matrix Simazine Cumulative Exposure Risk Assessment DDT Prostate cancer Occupational Exposure Surveys and Questionnaires Environmental health medicine Humans Pesticides Risk factor Aged Retrospective Studies Gynecology British Columbia business.industry Confounding Absolute risk reduction Case-control study Prostatic Neoplasms Cancer Agriculture medicine.disease Agricultural Workers' Diseases Logistic Models Oncology Case-Control Studies business Hexachlorocyclohexane |
| Zdroj: | The Prostate. 71:168-183 |
| ISSN: | 0270-4137 |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND Several epidemiologic studies have reported an increased risk of prostate cancer among farmers. Our aim was to assess the risk of developing prostate cancer in relation to exposure to specific active compounds in pesticides. METHOD A case–control approach was used with 1,516 prostate cancer patients and 4,994 age-matched internal controls consisting of all other cancer sites excluding lung cancer and cancers of unknown primary site. Lifetime occupational history was obtained through a self-administered questionnaire and used in conjunction with a job exposure matrix to estimate the participants' lifetime cumulative exposure to approximately 180 active compounds in pesticides. Conditional logistic regression was used to assess prostate cancer risk, adjusting for potential confounding variables and effect modifiers. These include age, ethnicity, alcohol consumption, smoking, education, and proxy respondent. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The significant association between prostate cancer risk and exposure to DDT (OR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.04–2.70 for high exposure), simazine (OR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.08–3.33 for high exposure), and lindane (OR = 2.02; 95% CI: 1.15–3.55 for high exposure) is in keeping with those previously reported in the literature. We also observed a significant excess risk for several active ingredients that have not been previously reported in the literature such as dichlone, dinoseb amine, malathion, endosulfan, 2,4-D, 2,4-DB, and carbaryl. Some findings in our study were not consistent with those reported in the literature, including captan, dicamba, and diazinon. It is possible that these findings showed a real association and the inconsistencies reflected differences of characteristics between study populations. Prostate 71: 168–183, 2011. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text