The use of iliac branch devices for preservation of flow in internal iliac artery during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
| Autor: | Constantine N. Antonopoulos, Konstantinos G. Moulakakis, Alexandros Giosdekos, Andreas M. Lazaris, Achilleas Chatziioannou, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, George Geroulakos, John D. Kakisis, George S. Sfyroeras |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors medicine.medical_treatment 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Prosthesis Design 03 medical and health sciences Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation 0302 clinical medicine Postoperative Complications Risk Factors medicine.artery medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Embolization Aged Aged 80 and over business.industry Endovascular Procedures Middle Aged medicine.disease Internal iliac artery Common iliac artery Confidence interval Abdominal aortic aneurysm Surgery Blood Vessel Prosthesis Erectile dysfunction medicine.anatomical_structure Treatment Outcome Regional Blood Flow Meta-analysis Iliac Aneurysm Female Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Artery Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal |
| Zdroj: | Journal of vascular surgery. 71(6) |
| ISSN: | 1097-6809 |
| Popis: | Objective Common iliac artery aneurysms are present in more than a third of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and may pose a challenge during open and endovascular repair. Although embolization of the internal iliac artery is an established method, it may be complicated with buttock claudication, erectile dysfunction, colon ischemia, and pelvic necrosis. Iliac branch devices (IBDs), which permit preservation of the hypogastric artery, have been used to prevent these complications. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the safety and outcomes of IBDs and to explore potential differences between the commercially available types of IBDs. Methods The meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. After review of the literature, 36 eligible studies with a total of 1502 patients were included in our study. A meta-analysis was performed with investigation of the following outcomes: technical success rate, 30-day mortality, 30-day patency, follow-up patency, endoleak, buttock claudication, and IBD-associated reintervention. Furthermore, we conducted a subgroup meta-analysis by commercial type of endograft among the outcomes of interest. Results Among all eligible studies, technical success of the method was 97.35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.27-98.29). The endoleak rate postoperatively and during the follow-up period was 12.68% (95% CI, 8.80-17.07). The 30-day patency of IBDs was estimated at 97.59% (95% CI, 96.49-98.54), whereas follow-up patency was 94.32% (95% CI, 91.70-96.54). Furthermore, reintervention rate associated with IBDs was 6.96% (95% CI, 5.10-9.03), and buttock claudication during the follow-up period was 2.15% (95% CI, 1.25-3.22). Conclusions IBD seems to be a safe, feasible, and effective technique for the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms in select patients with suitable anatomy. Further results are awaited to explore the long-term efficacy and durability of these devices. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|