Primary treatment of atlantoaxial rotatory fixation in children: a multicenter, retrospective series of 125 cases
| Autor: | Naoto Shiba, Takeharu Sasaki, Tsunemasa Matsubara, Kei Yamada, Masafumi Goto, Kenji Mizokami, Shoji Iwahashi, Hidetomo Nakamura, Kotaro Jimbo, Kimiaki Sato, Takahiro Shimazaki |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Neck pain Wilcoxon signed-rank test business.industry General Medicine medicine.disease Logistic regression Surgery 03 medical and health sciences Fixation (surgical) 0302 clinical medicine Symptom relief 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis medicine Primary treatment medicine.symptom business Range of motion 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Torticollis |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 34:498-505 |
| ISSN: | 1547-5654 |
| DOI: | 10.3171/2020.7.spine20183 |
| Popis: | OBJECTIVEThe primary treatment for atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the primary treatment for AARF and create an algorithm for primary treatment.METHODSThe authors analyzed the data of 125 pediatric patients at four medical institutions from April 1989 to December 2018. The patients were reported to have neck pain, torticollis, and restricted neck range of motion and were diagnosed according to the Fielding classification as type I or II. As a primary treatment, 88 patients received neck collar fixation, and 28 of these patients did not show symptom relief and required Glisson traction. Thirty-seven patients were primarily treated with Glisson traction. In total, 65 patients, including neck collar treatment failure patients, underwent Glisson traction in hospitals.RESULTSThe success rate of treatment was significantly higher in the Glisson traction group (97.3%) than in the neck collar fixation group (68.2%) (p = 0.0001, Wilcoxon test). In the neck collar effective group, Fielding type I was more predominant (p = 0.0002, Wilcoxon test) and the duration from onset to the first visit was shorter (p = 0.02, Wilcoxon test) than that in the neck collar ineffective group. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis with the above items, the authors generalized from the estimated formula: logit [p(success group by neck collar fixation group)|duration from onset to the first visit (x1), Fielding type (x2)] = 0.4(intercept) − 0.15x1 + 1.06x2, where x1 is the number of days and x2 = 1 (for Fielding type I) or −1 (for Fielding type II). In cases for which the score is a positive value, the neck collar should be chosen. Conversely, in cases for which the score is a negative value, Glisson traction should be the first choice.CONCLUSIONSAccording to this formula, in patients with Fielding type I AARF, neck collar fixation should be allowed only if the duration from onset is ≤ 10 days. In patients with Fielding type II, because the score would be a negative value, Glisson traction should be performed as the primary treatment. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|