Comparison of a simplified skin pointer device compared with a skeletal marker for knee rotation laxity: A cadaveric study using a rotation-meter
Autor: | Ken Lee Puah, Denny T. T. Lie, Siaw Meng Chou, Andy Khye Soon Yew |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Orthodontics
Measurement 030222 orthopedics Laxity Rottometer genetic structures business.industry Biomechanics 030229 sport sciences Basic Study Rotatometer musculoskeletal system stomatognathic diseases 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Pointer (computer programming) Mechanical engineering [Engineering] Medicine Knee Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Cadaveric spasm business Cruciate |
Zdroj: | World Journal of Orthopedics |
ISSN: | 2218-5836 |
DOI: | 10.5312/wjo.v9.i6.85 |
Popis: | AIM : To compare the measurements of knee rotation laxity by non-invasive skin pointer with a knee rotation jig in cadaveric knees against a skeletally mounted marker. METHODS : Six pairs of cadaveric legs were mounted on a knee rotation jig. One Kirscher wire was driven into the tibial tubercle as a bone marker and a skin pointer was attached. Rotational forces of 3, 6 and 9 nm applied at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion were analysed using the Pearson correlation coefficient and paired t-test. RESULTS : Total rotation recorded with the skin pointer significantly correlated with the bone marker at 3 nm at 0° (skin pointer 23.9 ± 26.0° vs bone marker 16.3 ± 17.3°, r = 0.92; P = 0.0), 30° (41.7 ± 15.5° vs 33.1 ± 14.7°, r = 0.63; P = 0.037), 45° (49.0 ± 17.0° vs 40.3 ± 11.2°, r = 0.81; P = 0.002), 60° (45.7 ± 17.5° vs 34.7 ± 9.5°, r = 0.86; P = 0.001) and 90° (29.2 ± 10.9° vs 21.2 ± 6.8°, r = 0.69; P = 0.019) of knee flexion and 6 nm at 0° (51.1 ± 37.7° vs 38.6 ± 30.1°, r = 0.90; P = 0.0), 30° (64.6 ± 21.6° vs 54.3 ± 15.1°, r = 0.73; P = 0.011), 45° (67.7 ± 20.6° vs 55.5 ± 9.5°, r = 0.65; P = 0.029), 60° (62.9 ± 22.4° vs 45.8 ± 13.1°, r = 0.65; P = 0.031) and 90° (43.6 ± 17.6° vs 31.0 ± 6.3°, r = 0.62; P = 0.043) of knee flexion and at 9 nm at 0° (69.7 ± 40.0° vs 55.6 ± 30.6°, r = 0.86; P = 0.001) and 60° (74.5 ± 27.6° vs 57.1 ± 11.5°, r = 0.77; P = 0.006). No statistically significant correlation with 9 nm at 30° (79.2 ± 25.1° vs 66.9 ± 15.4°, r = 0.59; P = 0.055), 45° (80.7 ± 24.7° vs 65.5 ± 11.2°, r = 0.51; P = 0.11) and 90° (54.7 ± 21.1° vs 39.4 ± 8.2°, r = 0.55; P = 0.079). We recognize that 9 nm of torque may be not tolerated in vivo due to pain. Knee rotation was at its maximum at 45° of knee flexion and increased with increasing torque. CONCLUSION : The skin pointer and knee rotation jig can be a reliable and simple means of quantifying knee rotational laxity with future clinical application. Published version |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |