Management Innovation and Open Innovation: For and Towards Dialogue
| Autor: | Cécile Ayerbe, Sophie Mignon, Sandra Dubouloz, Marc Robert |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion (GREDEG), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (... - 2019) (UNS), COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), Institut de Recherche en Gestion et en Economie (IREGE), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry]), Montpellier Research in Management (MRM), Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Université de Perpignan Via Domitia (UPVD), ESIA, Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Université de Perpignan Via Domitia (UPVD)-Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School-Université de Montpellier (UM) |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Economics and Econometrics
Knowledge management 9. Industry and infrastructure business.industry Strategy and Management 05 social sciences Work (electrical) Order (business) Management of Technology and Innovation 0502 economics and business Openness to experience [SHS.GESTION]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration 050211 marketing Sociology Business and International Management Dimension (data warehouse) business 050203 business & management Reciprocal Open innovation |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Innovation Economics & Management Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, De Boeck Supérieur 2020, Managerial Innovation and Open Innovation Strategies, pp.13-41. ⟨10.3917/jie.032.0013⟩ |
| ISSN: | 2032-5355 |
| DOI: | 10.3917/jie.032.0013 |
| Popis: | International audience; This paper shows the full relevance of having a closerdialogue between the literatures on OI and MI thanis currently the case.Some encouraging and extremely interesting results have been reportedby MI research using the OI paradigm, and research on the organizationallevel of OI which echoes the MI literature. In particular, the literature on MI has examined the role of knowledge, experience and external agents in an outside-in perspective. The areas covered byMIresearch call for integration of the OI paradigm into the fieldof MI, to give ‘Open Management innovation’. In parallel, the literature on OI has called for reflection on organizationaldesign, structures, managerial practices in general and HR management in particular in order to manageopenness. However, the links highlighted remain weak, and the number of studies is low. Also, the summary proposedhere has shown their limitations and the need for replication or further investigation. Closer connections or a dialogue between the two fields of innovation management appears to be more than relevant and appropriate for their mutual enrichment. This studyhas identified promising and necessary research perspectives. More systematic discussions between these two communities could extend their respective boundaries and pave the wayfor a more integrative approach. This would give us an understanding of theconditions in which OI and MI respectively lead to other types of innovations, and what those types are, and in return how they feed and reinvent themselves in a recursive loop process. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|