Labiobaetis pulchellus

Autor: Kluge, Nikita, Sivaruban, T., Srinivasan, Pandiarajan, Barathy, S., Isack, Rajasekaran
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7836237
Popis: Labiobaetis pulchellus (Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard, 1985) (Figs 1–64) Baetis pulchellus Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985: 544 (larva). Baetis (Mullerbaetis) pulchellus: Kang & Chang & Yang 1994. Labiobaetis pulchellus: McCafferty & Waltz 1995: 21; Kluge 2022: 163 (subimago). Pseudocloeon pulchellum: Lugo-Ortiz, McCafferty & Waltz 1999: 25. Labiobaetis soldani Kubendran, Rathinakumar, Balasubramanian, Selvakumar & Sivaramakrishnan 2014: 2 (larva, J & ♀ imago). Material examined. SRI LANKA: boundary between Uva province and Central province, tributary of river Uma near Randenigala dam, 14–15.I.2011, coll. N. Kluge & L. Sheyko: 1 L-S-IJ, 1 L-SJ, 2 L-S-I ♀ (ZIN); Central province, Ginigathhena (17 km N Hatton), 31.I–3.II.2011, coll. N. Kluge & L. Sheyko: L/S ♀ (ZIN); Sabaragamuwa Province, Dalhausie near Sri Pada (Adam's Peak), river Seetha Gangula, 6.II.2020, coll. N. Kluge & L. Sheyko: 1 L-S-IJ (ZIN). INDIA: Karnataka state, Udupi district, river Seethanadi near Someswar, 31.II.2013, coll. N. Kluge & L. Sheyko: 1 L-S-IJ (ZIN); Kerala state, Kottayam district, Erumeli, 18–21.I.2016, coll. N. Kluge & L. Sheyko: 2 L /SJ (ZIN); Tamil Nadu state, Madurai, river Vaigai, 10.II.2016, coll. N. Kluge & L. Sheyko: 1 S-IJ, 1 S-I ♀ (ZIN); the same locality, 12.XII.2022, coll. P. Srinivasan & R. Isack: 1 L-S-IJ, 1 SJ, 1 S ♀, 3 LJ, 2 L ♀ (AMC); Dindigul, Kodaikanal hills, Mangalamkombu stream, 16.II.2020, coll. P. Srinivasan & R. Isack: 2 LJ (AMC); Theni, Suruli falls, 13.XI.2021, coll. P. Srinivasan & R. Isack: 4 LJ (AMC). Additional descriptions Larva. CUTICULAR COLORATION: Head from brown with colorless blanks (Fig. 1) to light ochre. Pronotum from brown to ochre, with lighter ovoid sigilla; mesonotum from brown with colorless blanks to ochre with lighter and darker areas; fore protopteron from brown to ochre with indistinct lighter striation along longitudinal veins (Figs 3, 6, 9). Metanotum, thoracic pleura and certain areas of thoracic sterna from contrastingly colored with brown (Fig. 2) to nearly colorless. Legs mostly ochre or colorless; each femur at midlength with brown macula adjacent to inner margin; with (Figs 2, 27) or without (Fig. 5) contrasting brown macula at base. Tibia with brown apex of outer side; tarsus with brown apex of outer side (Figs 2, 5, 27). Abdominal terga from brown with contrasting blanks to pale ochre with diffusive blanks; submedian sigilla lighter than background; terga I–IX either all with uniform color pattern (Figs 10, 12; Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985: fig. 15; Kubendran et al. 2014: figs 1–4), or differentiated, with different median blanks on different segments; in this case, tergum V always lighter than others or with largest unpaired median blank (Figs 4, 7, 11). Abdominal sterna from nearly colorless (Fig. 10) to brown with lighter submedian sigilla and colorless median blank adjacent to posterior margin (Figs 4, 7). Caudalii light, with brown band just distad of midlength (Figs 4, 8, 11, 12). Both forms of abdominal coloration, i.e. with the 5th tergum lightest (Figs 4, 7, 11) and with all terga uniformly colored (Figs 10, 12) are found among larvae both from Sri Lanka and from India. Among 20 larval specimens examined, 15 male larvae have contrasting coloration with 5th tergum lightest (Figs 4, 7, 11), and only one reared male specimen from Sri Pada has larval terga uniformly colored (as in Kubendran et al. 2014: fig. 1); all 4 female larvae have abdominal terga uniformly colored (Figs 10, 12). HYPODERMAL COLORATION: Not expressed. SHAPE AND SETATION: Described by Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard (1985) and Kubendran et al. (2014). Frons between antennae narrow, but non-carinate (Fig. 61). Scape with distolateral process (Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985: fig. 6d). Labrum dorsally with long, fine, simple setae scattered over surface; submarginal arc of setae composed of 1 + 3 long, simple setae, the first two setae after the central seta closely together (Fig. 13). Left mandible between prostheca and mola slightly convex, with minute denticles toward mola; mola without apical tuft of setae; right mandible between prostheca and mola convex; mola with apical tuft of setae (Figs 14–15; MüllerLiebenau & Hubbard 1985: fig. 6e). Hypopharynx with medial tuft of stout setae well developed and short (Fig. 17). Maxillary palp with distal excavation of inner margin (Fig. 18; Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985: fig. 6g). Labium with paraglossae wide, with apical setae forming three rows; labial palp with broad distomedial protuberance of 2nd segment and conical 3rd segment (Fig. 16; Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985: figs 6b–c). Hind protoptera present, in female somewhat smaller than in male (Figs 19, 21, 23, 25). Legs of all three pairs: Outer side of femur with row of long, stout, blunt setae (Fig. 28) and two such apical setae; apex with short, stout, spatulate setae. Inner side of femur with pointed, lanceolate setae (Fig. 29). Femoral patch (villopore) present on middle and hind legs, vestigial or absent on fore legs. Outer side of tibia with short, blunt, spatulate, stout setae; on apex one longer, blunt, spatulate seta; inner side of tibia with stout, pointed setae (Fig. 30; Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985: fig. 6h). Outer side of tarsus with blunt, stout setae smaller than on tibia. Claw without subapical setae (Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985: fig. 6i). All abdominal terga I–X with denticles on posterior margin; denticles on anterior terga smaller and blunt (Fig. 31), denticles on posterior terga larger and pointed (Fig. 32); on tergum IX denticles behind bases of submedian setae smaller of absent (Fig. 33). Abdominal sterna I– VI without denticles; sterna VII–VIII with few spaced, wide, triangular denticles (Figs 34–35); sternum IX with pointed denticles; in male row of denticles interrupted by protogonostyli (Fig. 36). Paraproct with pointed denticles increasing distally (Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985: fig. 6j). All 7 pairs of tergalii present, tergalii of 1st pair smaller than others (Fig. 4). Subimago. CUTICULAR COLORATION: Mostly light brownish (Figs 37–43). HYPODERMAL COLORATION: As in imago. TEXTURE: On all legs of both sexes, last tarsal segment covered with pointed microlepides; other tarsomeres covered mostly with blunt microlepides, with few pointed microlepides on distal margin (Figs 38–40) (Kluge 2022). Imago, male (Figs 44–50). Head brown. Turbinate eyes from red to yellow, widened distally. Thorax dark brown. Fore wing with membrane colorless, veins ochre. Pterostigma with incomplete oblique veins connected with costal vein, but not with subcostal vein. Hind wing narrow, without costal projection, with 2 longitudinal veins (Figs 20, 22, 24). Legs of all pairs ochre, either with red-brown band near apex of femur (Figs 52–53), or without it (Figs 54–55). Middle and hind tarsi with 2 apical spines (on 1st+2nd and 3rd segments). Abdominal terga and sterna mostly ochre or whitish; each tergum II, IV and VI with small brown or reddish spot at midline near fore margin, either without other coloration (Figs 44, 48) or with red area by sides and behind spot (Figs 45–47, 49–50; Kubendran et al. 2014: fig. 18); terga I, III and V lack this spot and red area. Gonostyli with 1st segment parallel-sided, with prominent rectangular apical-inner angle; 2nd segment narrow in proximal part and wider in distal part; 3rd segment short and roundish, sharply separated (Figs 56–60). Penial bridge projected caudally forming pair of rounded lobes with deep concavity between them, with sharply pointed, sclerotized denticle arising from middle of this concavity; gonovectes sharply bent (Figs 56, 57, 60). Imago, female (Fig. 51). Head, thorax and abdomen ochre with brown. All tarsi with 2 apical spines (fore tarsus on 2nd and 3rd segments, middle and hind tarsi on 1st+2nd and 3rd segments). Wings as in male; hind wing smaller (Fig. 26). Egg. Widely oval; chorion smooth, without regular relief; one pole surrounded by fine, narrow, ring-form groove, with or without few indistinct, shallow protuberances just outside groove (Figs 62–64). Dimension. Fore wing length 4 mm. Distribution. Southern India and Sri Lanka. Synonymy of L. soldani. According to the original description, Labiobaetis soldani differs from L. pulchellus by the following characters (Kubendran et al. 2014: table 1): Submarginal bristles on labrum: «feathery» in L. soldani, «fine» in L. pulchellus. According to the original description of L. pulchellus «submarginal fine bristles single (not in a dense row)»; here the term «submarginal bristles», refers to the setae located at a distance from the distal margin and present on the drawing, on which the marginal feathery setae are not drawn (Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985: fig. 6a). According to the original description of L. soldani, its labrum «with an arc and stout setae, long and thin setae medially; distal margin bordered with setae, distolaterally 14 feathered bristles; ventrally with 4 stout, 2 long setae and distomedial arc of very thin setae». On the drawing (Kubendran et al. 2014: fig. 8), both dorsal and ventral sides of the labrum are drawn together, and the marginal feathery setae are present as well. So different setae are reported as «submarginal bristles» in the comparison of L. soldani and L. pulchellus. Ratio of paraglossae to glossae in width: «1.8x» in L. soldani, «2x» in L. pulchellus. This difference is less than the possible accuracy of paraglossa measurement. Apex of labial palp: «slightly pointed» in L. soldani, «pointed» in L. pulchellus. Judging by the original drawings (Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985: fig. 6b; Kubendran et al. 2014: fig. 13) difference between left and right palps can be greater than between the individuals attributed to these two species. Hind wing (and hind protopteron of larva): «absent» in L. soldani, «well developed» in L. pulchellus. Actually, the presence of hind wings in L. soldani was overlooked (Kubendran, personal communication). Pointed setae on the margin of femur: «6» in L. soldani, «8» in L. pulchellus. Such variability is found on different legs of one and the same individual. Thus, no one species-specific character separating L. soldani from L. pulchellus has been reported. The unusual coloration of male imaginal abdomen, with alternating colored even segments II, IV and VI and colorless odd segments I, III and V testifies that the form described as L. soldani from India is conspecific to L. pulchellus originally described from Sri Lanka.
Published as part of Kluge, Nikita, Sivaruban, T., Srinivasan, Pandiarajan, Barathy, S. & Isack, Rajasekaran, 2023, Diagnosis, variability, distribution and systematic position of Labiobaetis pulchellus (Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985) (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae, Baetis s. l.), pp. 94-108 in Zootaxa 5264 (1) on pages 96-106, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5264.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/7836228
{"references":["Muller-Liebenau, I. & Hubbard, M. D. (1985) Baetidae from Sri Lanka with some general remarks on the Baetidae of the Oriental Region (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). Florida Entomologist, 68 (4), 537 - 561. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 3494855","Kang, S. C., Chang, H. C. & Yang, C. T. (1994) A revision of the genus Baetis in Taiwan (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). Journal of Taiwan Museum, 47 (2), 9 - 44.","McCafferty, W. P. & Waltz R. D., (1995) Labiobaetis (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae): new status, new North American species, and related new genus. Entomological News, 106 (1), 19 - 28.","Kluge, N. J. (2022) Taxonomic significance of microlepides on subimaginal tarsi of Ephemeroptera. Zootaxa, 5159 (2), 151 - 186. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 5159.2.1","Lugo-Ortiz, C. R., McCafferty, W. P. & Waltz, R. D. (1999) Definition and reorganization of the genus Pseudocloeon (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) with new species descriptions and combinations. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 125 (1 - 2), 1 - 37.","Kubendran, T., Rathinakumar, T., Balasubramanian, C., Selvakumar, C. & Sivaramakrishnan K. G. (2014) A new species of Labiobaetis Novikova & Kluge, 1987 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from the southern Western Ghats in India, with comments on the taxonomic status of Labiobaetis. Journal of Insect Science, 14 (86), 1 - 10. https: // doi. org / 10.1673 / 031.014.86"]}
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: