Prepositions with CP and their implications for extended projections

Autor: Peter Svenonius
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
050101 languages & linguistics
Linguistics and Language
Class (set theory)
VDP::Humanities: 000::Linguistics: 010::Nordic languages: 018
Computer science
05 social sciences
VDP::Humanities: 000::Linguistics: 010::General linguistics and phonetics: 011
Norwegian
VDP::Humaniora: 000::Språkvitenskapelige fag: 010::Engelsk språk: 020
Part of speech
050105 experimental psychology
Language and Linguistics
language.human_language
Linguistics
Lexical item
VDP::Humaniora: 000::Språkvitenskapelige fag: 010::Nordiske språk: 018
Projection (mathematics)
VDP::Humanities: 000::Linguistics: 010::English language: 020
language
VDP::Humaniora: 000::Språkvitenskapelige fag: 010::Allmenn språkvitenskap og fonetikk: 011
Dependent clause
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Subcategorization
Complement (linguistics)
Food Science
Popis: In some limited cases, English allows a particular preposition to combine with a certain kind of subordinate clause, as exemplified by in that in “I take the proposal seriously, in that I loathe it”. In contrast, Norwegian systematically allows prepositions to combine with subordinate clauses (as in Det resulterte i at vi vant, literally “It resulted in that we won”). I argue that the English case should be handled as the subcategorization for a certain complement class by a particular lexical entry, while the Norwegian case indicates that the extended projection of clauses can continue up to the preposition. This highlights an important difference between lexical selection and extended projection, revealing a hitherto underappreciated source of parametric variation, and sheds light on several properties of extended projections as well as of prepositions. Specifically, the extended projections of N and V may “converge” at P, challenging the notion of extended projection as being confined to a single lexical category.
Databáze: OpenAIRE