Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography
Autor: | Kunihiko Sawada, D Rottke, P Poxleitner, L Grossekettler, Dirk Schulze |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2013 |
Předmět: |
Radiography
Radiation Dosage Imaging phantom Lead shielding Radiation Protection Paired samples fashion Radiography Panoramic Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Humans Medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging General Dentistry Phantoms Imaging business.industry Research Radiography Dental Digital General Medicine Otorhinolaryngology fashion.garment Electromagnetic shielding Lead apron Radiation protection business Nuclear medicine |
Zdroj: | Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 42:20130302 |
ISSN: | 1476-542X 0250-832X |
DOI: | 10.1259/dmfr.20130302 |
Popis: | This study investigated the absorbed doses in a full anthropomorphic body phantom from two different panoramic radiography devices, performing protocols with and without applying a lead apron.A RANDO(®) full body phantom (Alderson Research Laboratories Inc., Stamford, CT) was equipped with 110 thermoluminescent dosemeters at 55 different sites and set up in two different panoramic radiography devices [SCANORA(®) three-dimensional (3D) (SOREDEX, Tuusula, Finland) and ProMax(®) 3D (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland)] and exposed. Two different protocols were performed in the two devices. The first protocol was performed without any lead shielding, whereas the phantom was equipped with a standard adult lead apron for the second protocol.A two-tailed paired samples t-test for the SCANORA 3D revealed that there is no difference between the protocol using lead apron shielding (m = 87.99, s = 102.98) and the protocol without shielding (m = 87.34, s = 107.49), t(54) = -0.313, p 0.05. The same test for the ProMax 3D showed that there is also no difference between the protocol using shielding (m = 106.48, s = 117.38) and the protocol without shielding (m = 107.75, s = 114,36), t(54) = 0.938, p 0.05.In conclusion, the results of this study showed no statistically significant differences between a panoramic radiography with or without the use of lead apron shielding. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |