Prospective randomized comparative study of use of PLMA and ET tube for airway management in children under general anaesthesia
| Autor: | Mamta G Patel, Geetika Bansal, VN Swadia |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2010 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
endotracheal tube (ett) medicine.medical_treatment Sevoflurane lcsh:RD78.3-87.3 Laryngeal mask airway medicine Sore throat General anaesthesia Clinical Investigation patients: children Anaesthesia: general anaesthesia business.industry medicine.disease Surgery Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pulmonary aspiration lcsh:Anesthesiology Anesthesia equipment: proseal laryngeal mask airway (plma) Vomiting Airway management medicine.symptom Airway business medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 54, Iss 2, Pp 109-115 (2010) |
| ISSN: | 0019-5049 |
| DOI: | 10.4103/0019-5049.63643 |
| Popis: | ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) for children had been introduced in 2004, by Dr. Archie Brain. It has, in addition to Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway (CLMA), a drainage tube for providing a bypass channel for gastric contents to prevent regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration. A randomized prospective study was performed comprising of 60 ASA - I/II patients, between the age groups of 3 and 10 years, of either sex. All the patients were premedicated with oral Midazolam and Glycopyrollate. General anaesthesia with caudal epidural analgesia was given in all the cases. Inhalation with 8% Sevoflurane was used as a sole induction agent in all the patients. They were randomly divided into two groups. PLMA was inserted in patients of Group P and Endotracheal Tube (ETT) in patients of Group I. In all cases, after PLMA / ETT insertion; caudal epidural analgesia was given and general anaesthesia (GA) using Sevoflurane was provided for maintenance of anaesthesia. Muscle relaxant was not used in our study. We studied parameters such as number of attempts, ease of insertion and conditions during insertion, haemodynamic parameters, changes in SpO(2), EtCO(2), gastric insufflation, regurgitation, pulmonary aspiration, postoperative airway complications and so on. We found that insertion of PLMA as well as ETT was performed in the first attempt in all the patients. Ease of insertion and conditions during insertion were comparable in both the groups. Changes in SpO(2) and EtCO(2) were comparable. However, highly significant changes in haemodynamic parameters were observed in the ETT group. Complications such as sore throat (13.33% cases), coughing (40% cases), vomiting (3.33% cases) and hypoxia (3.33% cases) were observed in the ETT group. No gastric insufflation or regurgitation was noted in our study. Thus, we concluded that PLMA could be used as an effective and safe airway device in children compared to ETT undergoing general anaesthesia. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|