Boris Choubert: The forgotten fit of the circum-Atlantic continents
Autor: | Jacques Kornprobst |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans (LMV), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement et la société-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)-Observatoire de Physique du Globe de Clermont-Ferrand (OPGC), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Global and Planetary Change
Wegener 010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences Paleozoic Plate tectonics [SDU.STU]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences 010502 geochemistry & geophysics 01 natural sciences Geological Concepts Bullard Precambrian Continental drift Paleontology [SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics] General Earth and Planetary Sciences Geology 0105 earth and related environmental sciences |
Zdroj: | Comptes rendus-Geoscience Comptes rendus-Geoscience, 2017, 349, pp.42-48. ⟨10.1016/j.crte.2016.12.002⟩ |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.crte.2016.12.002⟩ |
Popis: | International audience; Boris Choubert was a strong supporter of Wegener's continental drift theory. In 1935, he published a very accurate fit of the circum-Atlantic continents, which was based on continental edges instead of coastlines; in the same paper, he interpreted the Palaeozoic belts as the result of horizontal movements of the Precambrian blocks; so, he greatly expanded the role of continental drift through time. This original and very prophetic work was almost completely ignored by his contemporaries. Thirty years later (1965), Bullard, Everett and Smith published in turn a similar but more sophisticated fit; they did not acknowledge Choubert's initial work. Bullard's fit was met with immediate and tremendous success. The present paper analyses the reasons why Boris Choubert was frustrated of his pioneering role. This lack of recognition is related to: (1) a great evolution in the geological concepts between 1935 and 1965, and (2) a poor choice of Choubert, regarding the title of his 1935 article. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |