Animal Research, Accountability, Openness and Public Engagement: Report from an International Expert Forum

Autor: Joanne Zurlo, Marina A.G. von Keyserlingk, Katarina Cvek, Mark W. Fisher, William K. Milsom, Michael McDonald, Andrew N. Rowan, Margaret Rose, Daniel M. Weary, Elisabeth H. Ormandy, Kathrin Herrmann, Pru Hobson-West
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Animals, Vol 9, Iss 9, p 622 (2019)
Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
DOI: 10.3390/ani9090622
Popis: Simple Summary The issues of openness, transparency and public engagement about animal research have taken focus in several different countries in recent years. This paper gives an account of a two-day-long expert forum that brought together policy experts and academics from Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. The aim was to share current governance practices regarding openness and transparency of animal research and to brainstorm ideas for better public engagement. The facilitated conversations were transcribed and analysed to create this report and recommendations that encourage international policy-makers and other stakeholders to engage in genuine dialogue about the use of animals in research. Abstract In November 2013, a group of international experts in animal research policy (n = 11) gathered in Vancouver, Canada, to discuss openness and accountability in animal research. The primary objective was to bring together participants from various jurisdictions (United States, Sweden, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Canada and the United Kingdom) to share practices regarding the governance of animals used in research, testing and education, with emphasis on the governance process followed, the methods of community engagement, and the balance of openness versus confidentiality. During the forum, participants came to a broad consensus on the need for: (a) evidence-based metrics to allow a “virtuous feedback” system for evaluation and quality assurance of animal research, (b) the need for increased public access to information, together with opportunities for stakeholder dialogue about animal research, (c) a greater diversity of views to be represented on decision-making committees to allow for greater balance and (d) a standardized and robust ethical decision-making process that incorporates some sort of societal input. These recommendations encourage aspirations beyond merely imparting information and towards a genuine dialogue that represents a shared agenda surrounding laboratory animal use.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje