Does computer-assisted instruction really help to improve the learning process?

Autor:	Phongthara Vichitvejpaisal, Benjamas Preechakoon, Sukalya Sitthikongsak, Suppat Petcharatana, Chitprapa Manon, Kanita Kraiprasit, Sudta Parakkamodom
Rok vydání:	2001
Předmět:	Higher education media_common.quotation_subject education Computer-Assisted Instruction Education law.invention Text mining Software Randomized controlled trial law Reading (process) Learning theory Mathematics education Humans Prospective Studies Textbooks as Topic media_common Programmed Instructions as Topic business.industry Reproducibility of Results General Medicine Test (assessment) Psychology business Education Medical Undergraduate
Zdroj:	Medical Education. 35:983-989
ISSN:	1365-2923 0308-0110
Popis:	Objectives We have developed both a computer-assisted instruction (CAI) multimedia program and a textbook on arterial blood gas interpretation with the same content as formal didactic instruction. A prospective, randomized study was designed to compare the outcomes of self-learning using the software and using the textbook. Methods 80 third-year medical students were randomly allocated to two groups: the CAI (n=40) and text group (n=40). A 30-item, type-K examination was administered as the pre-test. After the pre-test, the volunteers in the CAI group studied the software program, whereas those in the text group spent their time reading the textbook covering the same material. The post-test was held immediately at the end of a full day of study, and 3 weeks later, the final test was performed without prior notice. A P value of
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::29a85ae581b3c8150509f8c122fd7bb9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2001.01020.x Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text ve formátu PDF Plný text ve formátu HTML
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje	K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.