Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Treatment: Qualitative Findings From Stakeholder Focus Groups
| Autor: | Kenneth Moore, Karen Rifkin, Irma H. Mahone, Ivora Hinton, Sarah P. Farrell, David Moody, Marcia Becker, Robert E. Johnson, Missy Rand Barker |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2011 |
| Předmět: |
Mental Health Services
Community-Based Participatory Research media_common.quotation_subject Decision Making Community-based participatory research Psychiatric Nursing Article Literacy Nursing Computer literacy Humans Medicine Family Active listening media_common Psychiatry Medical model Insurance Health business.industry Mental Disorders Community Participation Stakeholder Focus Groups Focus group Mental health Pshychiatric Mental Health business |
| Zdroj: | Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 25:e27-e36 |
| ISSN: | 0883-9417 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.apnu.2011.04.003 |
| Popis: | Purpose This article reports on findings from seven stakeholder focus groups conducted in exploring shared decision making (SDM) between provider and consumer in mental health (MH) treatment in public MH. Basic Procedures Seven focus groups were conducted with stakeholders—consumers, family members, prescribers, MH clinicians, and rural providers. Each of the focus groups was recorded digitally, transcribed into text, and analyzed qualitatively for recurring themes. Main findings Provider barriers to SDM include history of the medical model, MH crises, lack of system support, and time. Consumer-related barriers included consumer competency, fears, insight, literacy, and trauma from past experiences. Information-exchange issues include consumer passivity, whether consumers could be viewed as experts, and importance of adequate history information. New skills needed to practice SDM included provider's knowledge about alternative treatments, mastery of person-first language, and listening skills; consumer's ability to articulate their expert information; and computer skills for both providers and consumers. Outcomes expected from practice of SDM include greater sharing of power between provider and consumer, greater follow-through with treatment plans, greater self-management on the part of consumers, and improved therapeutic alliances. Principal conclusions Implementing SDM in public MH will impact consumers and their families, providers, prescribers, and administrators. More SDM trials in public MH are needed to answer some of the many questions that remain. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect