Hormones and monensin use to improve pregnancy rates in grazing lactating beef cows in the semiarid region of Argentina
| Autor: | Gustavo Adolfo Palma, Olegario Hernández, Pablo Sebastian Reineri, José Ignácio Arroquy J, Arnaldo Fumagalli, Mónica Belén Piccardi, Maria Sumampa Coria, G.A. Bo |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Tasa de Embarazo animal structures Monensina hormone Biology Ganadería Crossbreed MONENSIN 03 medical and health sciences chemistry.chemical_compound monensin Animal science HORMONE PREGNANCY RATE Gestación Pregnancy Grazing Seasonal breeder medicine Pastoreo Región Semiárida Argentina chemistry.chemical_classification General Veterinary volatile fatty acids Monensin 0402 animal and dairy science 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences Hormonas Producción Animal y Lechería medicine.disease 040201 dairy & animal science Beef Cattle Hormones VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS Pregnancy rate purl.org/becyt/ford/4.2 [https] 030104 developmental biology chemistry CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS Propionate Herd Animal Science and Zoology Original Article pregnancy rate Ganado de Carne purl.org/becyt/ford/4 [https] |
| Zdroj: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas instacron:CONICET Animal Reproduction 15 (1) : 56-63. (Jan.-Mar. 2018) INTA Digital (INTA) Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria instacron:INTA Animal Reproduction |
| Popis: | The objectives of this study were 1) to determine the effect of monensin treatment, alone or combined with a hormonal estrus synchronization treatment, on the pregnancy rate of lactating beef cows, and 2) to evaluate the effect of monensin capsule administration on ruminal metabolism in steers. In experiment 1, ninety-four cows were selected from a 300 cow herd. The experimental design used was a 2 x 2 factorial with the administration of monensin capsule as first factor (M1 = with monensin vs. M0 = without monensin) and hormonal treatment as second factor (H1 = with hormonal treatment vs. H0 = no hormonal treatment). Thirty-eight days before the beginning of the breeding season, cows were randomly assigned to the first factor, and thirty days later to the second factor, resulting in four treatments: M1H0, M1H1, M0H0 and M0H1. Cow were exposed to bull (bull/cow ratio 1:20) from day 0 (day 0 = start of the breeding season and 38 days after monensin capsule administration) to day 50. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed at 30, 60 and 80 days after start breeding season by ultrasonography. In experiment 2, eight ruminally cannulated crossbred beef steers were randomly assigned to two treatments (M1 and M0). To determine proportion of volatile fatty acids (VFA), ruminal fluid samples were taken on days 0, 40 and 77 of the experimental period, at 0, 4 and 12 h after grazing. In experiment 1, treatments whit monensin did not improve pregnancy rate (P = 0.95), however, hormonal treatment resulted in grater pregnancy rates (P = 0.03). In experiment 2, the proportion of VFA in ruminal fluid of steers was significantly different between treatments. The highest proportion of propionate was found in ruminal fluid from M1 treatment at 12 h after grazing (P = 0.04). In conclusion, the treatment with monensin increased the proportion of propionate. The result might suggest that energy balance was improved in steers, without improvement in cow´s pregnancy rates. Treatment with monensin alone did not improve pregnancy rate, nor did treatment with monensin enhance the pregnancy rate when a hormonal synchronisation treatment was given. Nevertheless, the use of a hormonal treatment increased pregnancy rate, suggesting that it could be used as a suitable tool to enhance the productivity in cows with marginal body condition score EEA Santiago del Estero Fil: Reineri, Pablo Sebastian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina Fil: Piccardi, Mónica Belén. Instituto de Bionanotecnología del NOA (CONICET-UNSE). Laboratorio de Producción Animal; Argentina Fil: Arroquy, Jose Ignacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina Fil: Fumagalli, Arnaldo Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina Fil: Sumampa Coria, María. Instituto de Bionanotecnología del NOA (CONICET-UNSE). Laboratorio de Producción Animal; Argentina Fil: Hernandez, Olegario. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina Fil: Bo, Gabriel Amilcar. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; Argentina. Institute of Animal Reproduction Córdoba; Argentina Fil: Palma, Gustavo Adolfo. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina. Instituto de Bionanotecnología del NOA (CONICET-UNSE). Laboratorio de Producción Animal; Argentina |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|