Five-Year Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes from the NOTION Randomized Clinical Trial in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk

Autor: Thomas Engstrøm, Henrik Nissen, Daniel A Steinbrüchel, Yanping Chang, Bo Juel Kjeldsen, Petur Petursson, Hans Gustav Hørsted Thyregod, Peter Bo Hansen, Peter Clemmensen, Lars Søndergaard, Lars Willy Andersen, Olaf Walter Franzen, Peter Skov Olsen, Troels H. Jørgensen, Nikolaj Ihlemann
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Thyregod, H G H, Ihlemann, N, Jørgensen, T H, Nissen, H, Kjeldsen, B J, Petursson, P, Chang, Y, Franzen, O W, Engstrøm, T, Clemmensen, P, Hansen, P B, Andersen, L W, Steinbrüchel, D A, Olsen, P S & Søndergaard, L 2019, ' Five-Year Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes from the NOTION Randomized Clinical Trial in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk ', Circulation, vol. 139, no. 24, pp. 2714–2723 . https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036606
Popis: Background: The NOTION trial (Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention) was designed to compare transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients ≥70 years old with isolated severe aortic valve stenosis. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes are presented after 5 years. Methods: Patients were enrolled at 3 Nordic centers and randomized 1:1 to TAVR using the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis (n=145) or SAVR using any stented bioprostheses (n=135). The primary composite outcome was the rate of all-cause mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 1 year defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar. The mean age was 79.1±4.8 years and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 3.0%±1.7%. After 5 years, there were no differences between TAVR and SAVR in the composite outcome (Kaplan-Meier estimates 38.0% versus 36.3%, log-rank test P =0.86) or any of its components. TAVR patients had larger prosthetic valve area (1.7 cm 2 versus 1.2 cm 2 , P P P P Conclusions: These are currently the longest follow-up data comparing TAVR and SAVR in lower risk patients, demonstrating no statistical difference for major clinical outcomes 5 years after TAVR with a self-expanding prosthesis compared to SAVR. Higher rates of prosthetic regurgitation and pacemaker implantation were seen after TAVR. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01057173.
Databáze: OpenAIRE