Effects of moisture conditions of dental enamel surface on bond strength of brackets bonded with moisture-insensitive primer adhesive system
Autor: | Sugako Sanpei, Yoshiroh Katoh, Toshiya Endo, Koichi Shinkai, Shohachi Shimooka, Rieko Ozoe |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2008 |
Předmět: |
Dental Stress Analysis
Materials science Orthodontic Brackets Dentistry Dental bonding Methacrylate Adhesives Materials Testing Shear strength Humans Desiccation Composite material Dental Enamel General Dentistry Universal testing machine Ethanol Enamel paint Bond strength business.industry Bracket Dental Bonding Water Resin Cements visual_art visual_art.visual_art_medium Methacrylates Adhesive Shear Strength business Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions |
Zdroj: | Odontology. 96:50-54 |
ISSN: | 1618-1255 1618-1247 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10266-007-0083-7 |
Popis: | The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effects of different degrees of water contamination on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to dental enamel with a moisture-insensitive primer (MIP) adhesive system and to compare the modes of bracket/adhesive failure. A total of 68 human premolars were divided into four groups by primers and enamel surface conditions (desiccated, blot dry, and overwet). In group I, the hydrophobic Transbond XT primer adhesive system was used under desiccated conditions for bonding the brackets; in group II, the hydrophilic Transbond MIP adhesive system was used under desiccated conditions; in group III, the hydrophilic Transbond MIP adhesive system was used under blot dry conditions; and in group IV, the hydrophilic Transbond MIP adhesive system was used under overwet conditions. Shear bond strength was measured with a universal testing machine, and the mode of bracket/adhesive failure was determined according to the adhesive remnant index. The mean shear bond strengths were not significantly different among groups I, II, and III, and were higher than the clinically required range of 6 to 8 MPa. The mean shear bond strength achieved in group IV was significantly lower than that achieved in groups I, II, and III, and also lower than the clinically required values. Bond failure occurred at the enamel-adhesive interface more frequently in group IV than in groups I and III. To achieve clinically sufficient bond strengths with the hydrophilic MIP adhesive system, excess water should be blotted from the water-contaminated enamel surface. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |