Engagement of community stakeholders to develop a framework to guide research dissemination to communities
| Autor: | Jennifer Cunningham-Erves, Mike Helms, Claudia Barajas, Yolanda Vaughn, Yvonne Joosten, Jim Hawk, Tilicia L. Mayo-Gamble |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Biomedical Research
Evidence-based practice Knowledge management Process (engineering) evidence‐based practice Trust Phase (combat) information (research) dissemination 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Surveys and Questionnaires Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Patient participation Dissemination Research dissemination lcsh:R5-920 research communication business.industry lcsh:Public aspects of medicine 030503 health policy & services Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health lcsh:RA1-1270 stakeholder participation Medical research ethics Research Personnel Original Research Paper General partnership patient participation lcsh:Medicine (General) 0305 other medical science business Psychology Original Research Papers |
| Zdroj: | Health Expectations, Vol 23, Iss 4, Pp 958-968 (2020) Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy |
| ISSN: | 1369-7625 1369-6513 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/hex.13076 |
| Popis: | Background Dissemination of research findings to past study participants and the community‐at‐large is important. Yet, a standardized process for research dissemination is needed to report results to the community. Objective We developed a framework and strategies to guide community‐academic partnerships in community‐targeted, dissemination efforts. Methods From 2017 to 2019, a community‐academic partnership was formed in Nashville, Tennessee, and iteratively developed a framework and strategies for research dissemination using cognitive interviews. A deductive, constant comparative analysis was conducted on interview responses to examine framework and strategy content. Feedback was used to finalize the framework and strategies for the evaluation. Using existing data, the framework's utility was evaluated in seven town hall meetings (n = 117). Bivariate analyses determined its effect on community members’ trust and willingness to participate in research using pre‐ and post‐surveys. Evaluation results were used to finalize the framework. Results The Community‐Engaged Research Dissemination (CERD) framework has two phases. Phase one is a preliminary planning phase with two steps, and phase two is the four‐step dissemination process. There are five standards to be upheld conducting these phases. We provide competencies for each component. Three feasible, culturally adapted strategies were developed as exemplars to disseminate research findings. Using pre‐ and post‐surveys for intervention evaluation, there was a significant difference in trust in medical research and researchers (P = .006) and willingness to participate in research (P = .013). Discussion and Conclusion The CERD framework can potentially standardize the process and compare the effect of dissemination efforts on the community's trust and willingness to participate in research. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
| Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |